Is Obama Leader Of The Free World?
"Leader of the free world "has been popping up from disparate sources referring to Barack Obama. Michelle Obama used it on the quiz show Jeopardy just last week. No, she was not a contestant. Her husband's re-election campaign purchased categories on the popular program. Michele read questions recorded on camera concerning her association with the campaign to combat obesity. Joe Biden followed the next evening touting auto companies bailed out by the Obama "stimulus." (Yes Jeopardy fans, the show sells product sponsorships for entire categories without disclosure -- in this case the Obama brand).
On NPR May 12, a reference to Obama's free world leader status was uttered by gay activist and author Armistead Maupin, who appears to have stoked his star-making machinery apparatus to trumpet approval for Obama's "historic" approval of gay marriage. Maupin, (I know him since we share the same home town) is a San Francisco-based author who rose to national attention in the early 1970s penning Tales of the City, a series in the San Francisco Chronicle.
Considering these references, there is no telling where else we will hear "leader of the free world" in the six months remaining until the November election, but the honorific is obviously a part of the campaign lexicon. I doubt the MSM will note the title stands in contradiction to the president's Obama Doctrine, dedicated to diminishing the role of the United States in world affairs and the effort to avoid hurting the feelings of other nations to encourage the demise of nationalism.
Obama's global view stems from anti-colonialism inherited from his father, a vocal and active participant in the anti-imperialist independence movement in Kenya against the British that resulted in the rise of the Mau-Mau. It is not a leap to reason, from Obama's point of view, that the US followed Great Britain as the world's leading imperial power, a position he loathes.
Consequently, the Obama Doctrine emphasizes negotiation and collaboration rather than confrontation and unilateralism if required in international affairs. Obama says the United States would have to "view our security in terms of a common security and a common prosperity with other peoples and other countries" - a far cry from the United States as leader of the free world.
Bernie Reeves is editor & publisher, Raleigh Metro Magazine, and founder, Raleigh Spy Conference.
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- A Taste of the Swamp
- Do We Have 677 Unelected Presidents?
- Global Relations beyond the Prime Directive
- The Democrat Party: The Enemy Within?
- Tariffs and the Moral High Ground
- ‘Mahmoud Khalil, Who Are You?’
- The Slush Fund Nobody Voted For
- Hacktivism and the Possibility of WW III
- Illegals Working for Congress?
- Should FBI Agents Learn Martial Arts?
Blog Posts
- The Shakespeare National Trust determines that Shakespeare is ‘not to be’
- Carville tells Democrats to quit making asses of themselves
- About that Texas congressman who called the transgender member of Congress 'Mister' ...
- A federal district court judge erases Trump’s ability to rid the country of enemy aliens
- In the UK, rape gangs are OK, pictures of women sans hijabs not so much
- Bacha Bazi still being practiced in Afghanistan; young boys sexually abused
- UN judge convicted of forcing a woman into indentured servitude
- What are capital gains, really?
- Trump begins restoring law and order
- Purge the poison: End Middle East Studies
- The Godfather: 53 and getting better all the time
- Why aren't Johnny and Suzie reading?
- ActBlue smurfs its way to oblivion
- Hunter Biden hotfoots it to a luxury vacation in South Africa, seemingly to avoid a deposition on his claimed poverty
- The Obamas' podcast bombs