9/11 plotters disrupt their arraignment at Gitmo
The lawyer for one of the terrorists says that the outbursts at the arraignment of the 9/11 plotters was ""peaceful resistance to an unjust system" - the irony lost on the barrister as well as the defendants. Still, it appears that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and others responsible for 9/11 will try to turn the proceedings into a circus.
All five men are charged with terrorism, hijacking aircraft, conspiracy, murder in violation of the law of war, attacking civilians, attacking civilian objects, intentionally causing serious bodily injury and destruction of property in violation of the law of war.
If convicted, they face the death penalty.
There were so many allegations behind the charges, it took more than two hours for officers of the court just to read into the record the details of the 9/11 hijackings.
Earlier, the refusal of the defendants to speak caused an issue with the court translations.
Mohammed's lawyer said that his client "will decline to communicate with the court."
Because the men wouldn't speak, the judge could not confirm that they could hear the translation of the proceedings. Time elapsed while they set up loudspeakers in the court to carry the translations. Some lawyers objected to this solution, too, and translation remained a problem at the outset of the hearing.
Pohl said he would enter a not guilty plea on Mohammed's behalf, if he refused to enter a plea. Later, the five men chose to defer entering a plea, a routine practice during military court proceedings.
![]()
The next hearing is scheduled for June 12. It will likely be at least a year before the case goes to trial, Pohl said.
Hours into Saturday's proceeding, one of the defendants broke his silence with an outburst.
Binalshibh shouted in heavily accented English: "You may not see us anymore," he said. "They are going to kill us."
It is incredible that more than a decade after the attacks, we are only at the arraignment stage of the trial of these murderers. Obama's ill-thought out idea to try them in civilian court set things back a bit, and wrangling in Congress over what rights the defendants will enjoy slowed things down even further.
And the idea that it will be another year before the trial begins is ridiculous. One can only hope that when the terrorists eventually face the firing squad, that they don't have to be wheeled to their execution on a hospital bed, suffering from the infirmities of old age.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- Knife control comes to the U.K.: Prime Minister Starmer bans Ninja swords
- This Tuesday, Wisconsonites must vote for Brad Schimel for the State Supreme Court
- Democrats should get a clue from the Palestinians who are now marching against Hamas
- Trump takes on Fauxahontas's brainchild
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.
- Amid disaster, watch Bangkok clean up and rebuild
- Katherine Maher shoots herself, and NPR, in the foot
- A visit to DOGE
- You just might be a Democrat if ...
- Yahoo Finance writer says Trump’s tariffs will see America driving Cuban-style antique cars
- Kristi Noem and the prison cell