Dems Mobilize in Missouri for Santorum
Through an odd sequence of decisions -- including a veto of a date change by Democratic governor Jay Nixon -- Missouri is stuck with a presidential preference primary on Tuesday that has very close to no meaning. We here in Missouri will actually pick our convention delegates at a series of caucus meetings on March 17.
What makes the primary interesting is the fact that Newt Gingrich missed the filing deadline. This will make the primary the first head-on confrontation between Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum among those voters not supporting Ron Paul. According to my contact, arguably the state's leading Democratic operative, the Dems will be sending their minions to the polls to vote for Santorum.
It is not that they like Santorum. In the perversely compartmentalized mind of the Democratic voter, Rick Santorum is known first and foremost as a homophobe. Google "Santorum," and the top item on the page -- just above "Rick Santorum for President" -- is a site called "spreadingsantorum.com."
The home page has no other element but a definition of "Santorum," one that is impressively vulgar even by left wing standards. It reads, "Santorum 1. The frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex." Young Democrats that I have talked to think this hilarious. More than 73,000 of them have clicked "like" on its Facebook counterpart. If possible, the site goes downhill from page one.
The Democratic strategy in Missouri is to deny Mitt Romney the nomination. The Dems I have talked to think "Rick Santorum" little more than a punch line for a dirty joke. According to the February 4, Rasmussen Report, however, the punch line is leading President Obama 45 to 44 percent in the daily tracking poll. A Santorum win, which seems likely, will make the joke all the more amusing.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- This Tuesday, Wisconsonites must vote for Brad Schimel for the State Supreme Court
- Democrats should get a clue from the Palestinians who are now marching against Hamas
- Trump takes on Fauxahontas's brainchild
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.
- Amid disaster, watch Bangkok clean up and rebuild
- Katherine Maher shoots herself, and NPR, in the foot
- A visit to DOGE
- You just might be a Democrat if ...
- Yahoo Finance writer says Trump’s tariffs will see America driving Cuban-style antique cars
- Kristi Noem and the prison cell
- Dividing the Democrats