Coitus welfare

Our country is going to hell in a hand basket and what is the federal government focused on?  Coitus welfare.

It might be funny if it weren't true.

Two billion dollars annually in taxpayer funding for such purposes apparently is insufficient.  What we need are (more) sex subsidies from -- or mandated by -- mUncle Sam.

And mere access to a plethora of affordable options isn't good enough.  It has to be "free" (though nothing really is).  What else did you expect from the Free Love crowd?

Frédéric Bastiat famously wrote "the state is but a great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else."  In the abomination that is Obama-nation perhaps that quotation should be amended to "...by which everyone tries to love at the expense of everyone else."

Maybe too a modern-day version of our 35th president's inaugural address would include something along the lines of "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what your country can do to help you do it."

Free love, coitus welfare.  So much for the liberals wanting the government to stay out of the bedroom.

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com