Obama's con on 'no lobbyist money' pledge
Remember Obama's pledge not to take money from lobbyists? He was going to usher in a new era of clean politics. He even repeated the pledge in a recent fundraising letter: "We don't accept any money from special-interest groups or Washington lobbyists."
Timothy Carney of the Washington Examiner didn't take the pledge at face value (unlike the dominant media) and checked the filings with the Federal Election Committee. His conclusion:
President Obama doesn't take campaign contributions from lobbyists -- unless you count the owners and CEOs of lobbying firms, corporate vice presidents for government relations, or managing directors for public policy.
It's all a con -- smoke and mirrors for a public that the Obama campaign presumes can be fooled, with the cooperation of the dominant media, who won't raise awkward questions to a level that would generate widespread public notice. Here's how the con works:
So how do they skate around Obama's "ban"? They are not currently registered under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and so they don't meet the Obama campaign's definition of "lobbyist." (snip)
Under federal law, anyone who spends at least 20 percent of his or her time on "lobbying activities" is supposed to register. There is almost no enforcement of this registration requirement, as proving a violation would require knowing how an unregistered individual spends all his time. The biggest effect of Obama's restrictions on lobbyists, regarding giving and serving on boards, has been mass deregistration of lobbyists.
But even the prohibition on registered lobbyists' gifts doesn't mean a Democrat has to deregister in order to fund Obama: the lobbyist could just let his or her spouse sign the check. Andy Manatos is president of lobbying firm Manatos & Manatos. "His effectiveness stems from the relationships of trust he has built with policymakers," his online bio reads. Manatos is a registered lobbyist, and so, in keeping with his narrow ban on lobbyist cash, the Obama campaign doesn't take contributions from him. But his wife, who lists her occupation as "homemaker," gave $3,000 to the Obama Victory Fund last month.
If you appreciate slick con men, then Barack Obama's your guy. But if you despise connivers who manipulate facts so as to be able to claim one thing while doing the other, but technically aren't lying, then you recognize Obama for what he is.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Net Neutrality Hydra: Twice Decapitated, Still Standing
- Cloward-Piven and the Migrant Invasion
- Acting on the Lessons of History
- Is Jamie Raskin Having a Psychotic Break?
- Mother or Monster?
- Donald Trump: Right Man, Right Moment
- Trump Means to Reduce China
- Islam Is Incompatible with Democracy
- ‘Maryland Man’ Not a Maryland Man
- If Rubio Doesn’t Act, He Risks Giving the CCP Dominance over South American Shipping
Blog Posts
- The jig is up! Newsom busted for blowing state Medicaid dollars on homeless housing
- What a shame to see Elon Musk returning to the private sector
- The almost-terrorist attack you didn’t hear about
- Trump’s unleashing of American energy is kneecapping China...and might just save Europe
- With Trump's agenda in peril, America is in peril
- How Republicans can score an immigration victory
- Time for Pam Bondi to get a move on
- Protecting America’s rich Christian heritage
- Europe then and now
- From 'Trump is Hitler' to dark woke?
- So Trump was right all along to use the Alien Enemies Act on Venezuela's state-linked Tren de Aragua
- Leftist judges (again) went on a rampage today
- Selfies with a corpse: Idiots take grinning cell phone photos with the body of Pope Francis, lying in state
- Buh-bye ActBlue! Trump set to sign memorandum targeting foreign dollars in American elections
- With the ‘Maryland father’ stunt failing, Democrats shift to the ‘disappeared’ Venezuelan