Brit taxpayers subsidize Muslim harems
The United Kingdom has gone mad with cultural "sensitivity" and is now officially subsidizing polygamy for Muslims on welfare, despite the fact that bigamy is a crime in Britain. From James Slack writing in the Daily Mail:
Husbands living in a "harem" with multiple wives have been cleared to claim state benefits for all their different partners.
A Muslim man with four spouses - which is permitted under Islamic law - could receive £10,000 a year in income support alone.
He could also be entitled to more generous housing and council tax benefit, to reflect the fact his household needs a bigger property.
Ministers have decided that, even though bigamy is a crime in Britain, polygamous marriages can be recognised formally by the state - provided they took place overseas, in countries where they are legal.
The outcome will chiefly benefit Muslim men with more than one wife.
Ministers estimate that up to a thousand polygamous partnerships exist in Britain, although they admit there is no exact record.
Potentially, the benefits bill for income support could reach £10m.
Why a country should subsidize any immigrant remains a mystery to me. I remember when immigrants to the United States had to prove they would not be a burden to the public treasury. That sensible policy was discarded some time ago, obviously. And, in fairness, one does hear of polygamous members of breakaway Mormon sects with multiple wives who collect substantial welfare benefits in this country.

And in further fairness, this country subsidizes illegal behavior in certain ways, such as distributing needles to junkies, in hopes they won't contract AIDS and other diseases as they destroy themselves with heroin and other drugs.
Still, our Muslim friends must be having quite a laugh at the way the British infidels grovel before almighty Islam. Saudi Arabia, the home of Islam, bans bibles, churches, shorts on foreign women, and many other aspects of western culture they find objectionable. And Britain, the US, and all the rest meekly accept this in the name of sensitivity.
But sensitivity is a one way street when it comes to Islam. So Britain agrees to import polygamous Muslim men and pay their living expenses and those of their harem.
It is obvious which side is winning the jihad.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Net Neutrality Hydra: Twice Decapitated, Still Standing
- Cloward-Piven and the Migrant Invasion
- Acting on the Lessons of History
- Is Jamie Raskin Having a Psychotic Break?
- Mother or Monster?
- Donald Trump: Right Man, Right Moment
- Trump Means to Reduce China
- Islam Is Incompatible with Democracy
- ‘Maryland Man’ Not a Maryland Man
- If Rubio Doesn’t Act, He Risks Giving the CCP Dominance over South American Shipping
Blog Posts
- What a shame to see Elon Musk returning to the private sector
- The almost-terrorist attack you didn’t hear about
- Trump’s unleashing of American energy is kneecapping China...and might just save Europe
- With Trump's agenda in peril, America is in peril
- How Republicans can score an immigration victory
- Time for Pam Bondi to get a move on
- Protecting America’s rich Christian heritage
- Europe then and now
- From 'Trump is Hitler' to dark woke?
- So Trump was right all along to use the Alien Enemies Act on Venezuela's state-linked Tren de Aragua
- Leftist judges (again) went on a rampage today
- Selfies with a corpse: Idiots take grinning cell phone photos with the body of Pope Francis, lying in state
- Buh-bye ActBlue! Trump set to sign memorandum targeting foreign dollars in American elections
- With the ‘Maryland father’ stunt failing, Democrats shift to the ‘disappeared’ Venezuelan
- Gunfight at the Oregon corral