Perry the target at GOP Tea Party debate
For the privilege of being the frontrunner, Rick Perry is going to have to endure 4 more pastings like this one.
Ed Morrissey has a good blow by blow account. And Fred Barnes correctly identifies the winner:
If a debate more than four months before the first vote is cast can influence the outcome of a presidential nomination race, the debate last night among eight Republicans should aid Mitt Romney's candidacy. Seldom has there been as clear a winner.
Romney was crisp and succinct, prepared and focused, and aggressive in going after his chief rival for the GOP presidential nomination, Texas governor Rick Perry, when he needed to be. Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, showed once again that he's a far better candidate now than he was four years ago.
He did well in these instances, among others: spelling out the differences between the health care plan he championed in Massachusetts and Obamacare; explaining the problem with the Fair Tax is that it gives short shrift to the middle class; pointing out the built-in advantages Perry has in Texas in governing successfully; and refraining from boasting, except to say that "if America needs a turnaround, that's what I do."
Romney challenged Perry on Social Security at the outset of the debate, which was held in Florida and billed as a collaboration of CNN and various Tea Party organizations. It was Tea Party people who asked the questions, mostly better ones than a panel of reporters or pundits would probably have asked.
I wouldn't be as gushy as Fred in my analysis but Romney was a clear winner. It's also clear that Perry has some work to do. While doing better this time out in answering tough questions, the Texas governor still sounds a little unsure of himself on a few issues - including the tuition for illegals issue.
Romney had some slip ups himself which shows the true value of these debates; exposing weaknesses before taking on Obama allows the candidate to prepare detailed responses to tough questions. You can recite a telephone book in response to a tough question and as long as you sound confident and non-evasive, the public generally won't hold it against you.
Once again, Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum appeared to get the short end of the questioning. Both candidates, while doing well last night, are going to have to find another way besides the debates to get back into the race.

Newt, Huntsman, Cain, and Ron Paul did nothing to help themselves.
All in all, a good night for Republicans
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- MS-13: A Transnational Terrorist Threat Ravaging America
- Trade Deficits Are Worse than You Think
- Ayn Rand’s Case against Tariffs
- The Rioter Cell of the Democrat Party has been Activated
- Let’s (Not) Celebrate Psychology Week
- Man's Best Friend or Environmental Villains?
- Bureaucratic Displacement in College Institutions
- For Ordinary People, Trump Is The Man Who Will Save The West
- Starmer Wants Trump’s Free Trade Deal—But Free Speech Comes First
- Here is the One Thing Trump Needs to Do That Changes EVERYTHING: Prove the 2020 Election was Stolen
Blog Posts
- Mahmoud Khalil, a spokesman for an organization advocating killing Jews, likens himself to an Auschwitz victim
- Import the third world ...
- A Massachusetts judge has blocked Trump’s effort to remove imaginary ‘genders’ from passports
- DOGE shows just how deep illegal immigration rot goes
- How climatologists got it all so horribly wrong
- It couldn’t be clearer, Democrats are pro-crime and anti-American
- Illinois’s insane leftism now propping up bordering states!
- Woke fascism at Binghamton University
- The hollow people
- The right choice in Texas
- Illegals: The latest
- Letitia James: Karma is a b***h
- Another disloyal officer is fired
- The new conservatives
- Another left-wing propaganda minion moves the goalposts