Geithner in April: 'No risk' of downgrade
What little does one need these days to qualify as an "expert" in -- anything?...
It does not seem wholly unreasonable to base one's assessment of the reliability of some purported exceptionally talented "expert" in their chosen field, by observing the amount of time that passes between the time the purported "expert" makes some bold "expert" prognostication, and the time that bold "expert" prognostication is proven remarkably inaccurate and is thus, wholly discredited.
Now, in light of the fact that President Obama, and administration and Democrat notables have uttered some rather bold prognostications that have proven, with the passage of time to be, er, rather unreliable, I've been bookmarking articles which contain records of such bold prognostications, in a browser folder entitled, of course, "Prognostications."
With the recent extremely contentious debt limit "negotiations," and the S&P downgrade of the US credit rating, I reckon one such bold prognostication is worth revisiting. From an April 19, 2011 Reuters article:
U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, going on the offensive one day after Standard & Poor's threatened to lower its top-tier rating on U.S. government debt, said on Tuesday there was "no risk" of a downgrade
<snip>
"Actually, I think things are better than they've been if you want to think about the prospects for improving our long-term fiscal position," he said on CNBC.
"If you're looking very carefully at what's happening in Washington, you see people on both sides -- Democrats and Republicans -- agreeing with the president that we have to put in place some reforms now to bring down our long-term deficits," he added.
Now, certainly Mr. Geithner has made other
What little does one need these days to qualify as an "expert" in -- anything?...
M. L. Pershern is a 17-month unemployed Senior Architect Project Manager and, in accordance with the Pew Research Center's "Political Typology" quiz, a "staunch conservative," although he describes himself as an independent constitutional conservative.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The NYT Prefers its Own Conspiracy Theories
- Would the FDA Pass Its Own Audit?
- War By Other Means: Demographics
- The Trump Administration’s Support for the Israel-Azerbaijan Strategic Partnership Can Benefit America
- This U.S. Under Trump is Strengthening Critical Minerals Sovereignty
- Upheaval and Pushback
- Why Do Democrats Hate Women and Girls?
- There is No Politics Without an Enemy
- On the Importance of President Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’
- Let a Robot Do It
Blog Posts
- Putin in the crosshairs
- I'm looking through you -- where did you go?
- So Milley was running the whole Ukraine war with Russia without telling the public -report
- New York’s ‘clean energy’ demands are unattainable, per industry’s own experts
- Astronauts carefully tell the truth
- California voters introduce new health care ‘access’ ballot initiative named after Luigi Mangione
- ‘American Oversight’? What a joke!
- Pete Hegseth in the line of fire—again
- Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is accused of plagiarizing parts of his Oxford thesis
- France goes the Full Maduro, bans leading opposition frontrunner, Marine Le Pen, from running for the presidency
- Bob Lighthizer’s case for tariffs
- An eye for an eye, an order for order
- Peace on the Dnieper?
- Tesla protestor banner: 'Burn a Tesla, save democracy'
- Pro-abortionists amplify an aborton protest's impact