US Mosque Data Bill O'Reilly Requested Now Available
Bill O'Reilly, to his considerable credit, does not shy away from the appropriate use and discussion of the word jihad -- for example, in this posting from July, 2007 entitled, "Avoiding the Jihad". Indeed, this author had a frank if somewhat brief discussion with Mr. O'Reilly on the subject (albeit "distracted" by the non-sequiturs of the requisite Muslim apologist who also participated in the segment) in May, 2006.
But Mr. O'Reilly has remained adamant that American Muslims are somehow uniquely resistant to the jihadist mentality, which he admits pervades even Western Muslim diaspora communities, notably, for example in Britain.
During a segment which aired Friday evening March 11, 2011, Mr. O'Reilly (in a discussion with Geraldo Rivera) questioned the validity of data alluded to by my colleague Frank Gaffney about American mosques -- study data at that time in press, but unpublished. The transcript of O'Reilly's comments capture his skepticism of these findings, and challenge to Frank Gaffney:
O'REILLY: I asked Congressman Ellison last night, OK, who's a Muslim congressman. There is an allegation that 75 percent of American mosques condone -- that's the important word -- Sharia law and elements of the jihad. 75 percent.
RIVERA: I don't know where that statistic comes from.
O'REILLY: That comes from Frank Gaffney's group. OK?
RIVERA: Frank Gaffney, again, a hard right...
O'REILLY: He's a hard right guy. Shouldn't that statistic be analyzed and either debunked or given credibility if he can back it up? Isn't that important?

RIVERA: I believe that, were a statistic like that accurate, I would have heard it from a source more reliably...
O'REILLY: Not in the press you wouldn't.
RIVERA: ... objective than Frank Gaffney. I have never seen him when he's not being extremely assertive and throwing around numbers.
O'REILLY: I'm not saying this guy is right. I want to know if there's...
RIVERA: I want to know what's going on in the mosques, also. And I will bet you every penny I have that there's not a mosque in this country that's not being surveilled right now by federal authorities, whom I trust far more than Frank Gaffney, with all due respect to him.
O'REILLY: All right. But you do want to know?
Now that the data Mr. O'Reilly questioned have been published, and analyzed, including a remarkably compendious discussion by Frank Gaffney himself, I humbly proffer this challenge to the purveyor of The Factor:
Please invite Frank Gaffney on to The O'Reilly Factor to have a thoughtful, civil discussion of the landmark study, "Sharia and Violence in American Mosques"
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
- Dismissing Evil and Denying the Holocaust — What’s the Endgame?
- The Witkoff Warning: Will Jordan’s King Fall?
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
Blog Posts
- Two new revelations about the Signal leak, along with two theories
- Big Tech’s Invisible Hand: How Google and Meta manipulate our elections
- New report: Netherlands is now euthanizing minors
- Tantalizing tidbits: Five news stories about leftists, and sea lions, acting aggressively
- Rockets to Roses: Israel’s bizarre trade cycle with Aza
- Fort Knox? Gold cams!
- There is no birthright citizenship for illegal aliens
- Turn off the phone. Close the laptop.
- Nine reasons Democrats are doomed to irrelevance
- Wagner College should restore Trump’s honorary degree—and set a national example against cancel culture
- The Signal Scandal was a nothingburger, but the WSJ takes the opportunity to attack Vance
- The Trump effect: An unprecedented investment surge and economic renewal
- Hydrocarbon-friendly Trump a match for energy-hungry India
- And Big Bird can’t sing
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction