'Slut': What's in a name?

I love it when media leftists make themselves look ridiculous defending their own, caught in misbehavior. The latest example, CNN's Randi Kaye, actually defending Ed Schultz's vile slander of Laura Ingraham as a "slut." She actually defended him by saying, "...there are mixed interpretations about the word."


Really? Outside of drunken fraternity boys, I can't think of many people who hold positive interpretations of the word.

CNN's Howard Kurtz is to be congratulated for his handling of this interview, though an outright burst into laughter might have been appropriate.  The invaluable Media Research Center has the details here. You can w atch the encounter there, while you try to think of "mixed interpretations" for other terms, such as "jerk," "idiot," and "ridiculous."
If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

Most Read


Last 24 Hours

Reza Pahlavi at CPAC? Big mistake
Nearing the Final Battle Against the Deep State
Watch white leftist women’s brains breaking—and repairing—in real-time
A curiosity about the DC District Court’s judges
The Fall and Fall of the Associated Press

Last 7 Days

Reza Pahlavi at CPAC? Big mistake
Nearing the Final Battle Against the Deep State
Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune