NATO says it needs more planes for Libya operation
To that request I say "duh." Of course they need more planes. But not just any planes; they need sophisticated, all weather strike aircraft with smart bombs and missiles to take out Gaddafi's armor currently being used in close quarters with civilians.
Mmmmmm...know anyone who might have a few of those kind of aircraft lying around not doing anything?
Of course, this is a plea to the US to re-enter the conflict with both feet. Even though NATO has 28 members, only France, the UK, Canada, Belgium, Norway and Denmark are contributing air craft to the fight against Gaddafi's forces. Spain and Italy - both with considerable air assets - have decided to sit this one out. As has Germany and Turkey who also could contribute air craft but oppose the strikes against Gaddafi in the first place.
The BBC report quotes NATO downplaying the crisis:
Some assessments suggest that Nato only needs about a dozen or so extra strike aircraft to maintain the tempo of operations.Only a few of Nato's 28 members - including France, the UK, Canada, Belgium, Norway and Denmark - are conducting air strikes.
Washington withdrew its fighter jets as it scaled back its role in the mission, although US planes are still targeting Col Gaddafi's air defences and it says it has still been flying a third of the missions.
Asked on Thursday if American forces could resume ground strikes, Mr Hague said the US was already making "a huge contribution".
"It's not unreasonable to ask other nations... to make additional contributions," Mr Hague added.
Several major Nato member countries, including Spain and Italy, have not taken part in attacks on ground targets.
With NATO finally facing reality about the rebels - that they are unorganized and unable to coalesce around a single group - they are realizing that they are not going to get much help in getting rid of Gaddafi. This is a formula for stalemate and eventual partition with Gaddafi still in charge of most of the oil and population.
Expect continued silence on the war from the administration. They would rather leave their NATO allies in the lurch that get involved in this politically toxic war.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Don't Trust Me, I'm a Doctor
- China Doesn't Know What to Do With Trump
- The Trump Administration Is Cleaning Up Our Military Academies
- No to Automatic Birthright Citizenship
- President Trump Can Snatch a Deep-Water Port in South America that China Covets
- The FBI Knew All Along
- Sotomayor’s Specter: No, the Alien Enemies Act Can’t Deport Americans
- Democrats Trade Morality for Madness
- Bringing Immigration Policy into Focus
- Judicial Imperialism: The House of Boasberg and the Left’s War on Sovereignty
Blog Posts
- Remembering the great Mario Vargas Llosa -- RIP
- Harvard declares that it’s entitled to have taxpayer money subsidize its free speech
- Peace in our time...with Iran?
- A newly discovered Teotihuacan altar reminds us that our child sacrifice is worse than theirs was
- New study: ‘Liberals generally trust science more than conservatives’
- Bondi DOJ allegedly evading FOIA requests for Epstein documents
- Whoopi Goldberg calls for higher taxes to keep the government big and well fed
- Why is Bondi’s DOJ still prosecuting a pistol brace owner?
- ‘Perceived foes’
- The echoes of valor
- Junk science at NOAA about to come to an end
- Donald Trump, free trade champion
- Junk science and air pollution
- Securing the border
- DOGE removes a dead-ender fighting his own Fallujah at the Social Security Administration -- and the left melts down