April 1, 2011
A NY Times writer defies the paper's taboo on 'terrorism' in Israel
It was most heartening to read an article by New York Times columnist Clyde Haberman about teenagers from five countries brought to New York to share their personal stories and their personal pain as psychological and physical victims of terrorism.("Wounded by Terrorism, Teenagers From 5 Nations Share Stories" New York section, April 1).
The column brought home a poignant truth that is too often overlooked in news articles that deal with terror attacks -- namely, that terrorism leaves permanent mental scars and that such attacks shouldn't be dismissed or overlooked just because there may be no immediate fatalities.
Haberman's piece was also refreshing in that it did not shy away from using the "T-for-terrorism" word in recounting some of the terrible terrorist attacks that scarred these youngsters. That's an amazing rarity in the pages of the New York Times and I can only assume he got away with it because, as a columnist, he's granted greater semantic latitude.
Whatever the reason, I applaud his avoidance of Orwellian euphemistic nonsense along with his straightforward description of how some of these youngsters were injured by terrorists while others lost dear ones. As he points out, "They had come to New York from five countries, but had one thing in common. Whether from Israel, Northern Ireland, France, Spain, or Liberia, each had been scarred by terrorism."
Also, that they had been brought to New York by a non-profit group that seeks to help "victims of terrorism who have lasting physical and psychological scars." and that one of their sponsors lost a father "killed in a 2002 terrorist attack in Rishon LeZiyyon, Israel."
What makes his account so remarkable -- and such a rarity at the NY Times -- is that such an event, if reported as a news story, would have been described as involving victims of ''attacks by militants" or wounded by "activists" -- any stale euphemism to avoid the "T" word -- especially if it involved a terror attack in Israel. In other countries, the "T" word osccasionally is allowed to slip in.
But when terrorism is perpetrated by Palestinians, news reporters at the Times definitely know not to use the "T" word.
So, kudos to Haberman for injecting semantic sanity into the pages of the Times -- if only for one brief moment.
And on April Fool's Day no less.
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- That Strange, Persistent, Cheering at a CEO's Murder is Proof We Are Now an Idiocracy
- North Korea is China's Proxy
- Scientific Societies Err on 'Climate Change'
- A 2025 Year of Jubilee Could End Slavery in America
- The Laken Riley Act Must Become Law
- Depopulation: A Space Odyssey
- Trump’s Incredibly High Stakes
- It’s Not Too Late to Boot Biden
- The Sinking of the USS Agility
- Culture and the Perils of Ideology
Blog Posts
- Why was John Lennon’s atheist anthem ‘Imagine’ sung at Jimmy Carter’s funeral — at the late president’s request?
- Disappointment from the Supreme Court
- Scenes from a funeral
- Americans, be careful for whom you vote; your lives may depend on it
- Fani Willis and the high cost of transparency theater
- More abortion means killing parental rights
- Socialism update: No lights in Cuba, no water in L.A.
- Let's update world maps to reflect American greatness
- Four years of Biden proves too close a shave
- Gavin Newsom actually does something right for once
- The reality of Stand Your Ground
- Can California's fires change woke to MAGA?
- A few suggestions for California Republicans
- Maybe California politicians should listen to Trump instead of seeking to Trump-proof the state
- As Los Angeles burns