« NY Times wrongly blames Israel for lack of peace talks with Syria, Palestinians | High Speed Delusion »
March 28, 2011
Romney's Big Political Hurdle
Conventional political wisdom cites Romneycare as former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney's biggest hurdle to the 2012 GOP Presidential nomination. But it's not.
If Romney becomes a candidate, Romneycare will, obviously, be an issue he'll need to address in order to become a leading, if not the leading, Republican candidate. But it's not an insurmountable hurdle, nor is it necessarily destined to be a drag on his potential campaign. In fact, it could become a plus. Here's how.
In the context of explaining why he signed the Massacheusetts 2006 health care reform bill, prolonged discussions as to his motives, and how Romneycare compares to Obamacare, will wear thin, and soon. And, talk that devolves into a wonkish discussion that parses the pros-and-cons of the two initiatives will leave yawning voters with glazed eyes.
Romney's best approach is that of the reformed addict -- someone who, once addicted to a substance or an ideology, speaks with enhanced credibility having learned from their mistakes. His campaign will aim to drive home this message: During Romney's watch, Massacheusetts tried a version of health care reform that he now acknowledges was a mistake. He, better than any other candidate, knows that the consequences of Obamacare will bring far worse harm to all fifty states.
It's the Reformed Addict Principle: The repentant alcoholic is a more compelling witness against excessive drinking than the life-time tea toddler. Been there. Done that. Knows it's bad for you. Who better to fix Obamacare - by total repeal or vast overhaul - than someone who once applied it on a smaller scale?
So, if effectively addressed, Romneycare can become a plus for a potential Romney campaign. But if his campaign wades into the weeds by comparing the two health care reforms initiatives, Romneycare will be, at best, a neutral factor in his campaign. At worse, it will bring guilt by genetic association.
In any regard, Romneycare isn't the biggest hurdle to a Romney nomination. Regardless of whether or not former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee becomes a candidate, Romney's biggest hurtle will be convincing more than a few conservative Christians that his membership in the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints -- the Mormons -- should not preclude them from supporting him.
On December 29, 2007, the American Thinker posted a piece entitled "The Context of Huck's Devilish Question." Therein I wrote:
Mike Huckabee's rhetorical question -- "Don't Mormons believe that Jesus and the devil are brothers?"-- to Zev Chafets in a New York Times Magazine article entitled "The Huckabee Factor" was aimed around evangelical Christian leaders and toward conservative Christian voters...So, when former Southern Baptist pastor Mike Huckabee said of the LDS, "I think it's a religion. I don't really know much about it," his unspoken message, to those with ears to hear, was clear.
Huckabee's disingenuous question back then was aimed at conservative Christians who don't recognize the Christian authenticity of the Church of the LDS. It reminded them that Romney is a Mormon. (Huckabee's recent misstatement about Obama growing up in Kenya may have been the same sort of indirect assault based on credible denial. In it, he revisited the controversy over the question of Obama's citizenship without directly mentioning it.)
If Romney and Huckabee compete head-to-head for the GOP Presidential nomination, the LDS issue is unlikely to openly re-emerge. But it will lurk in the background as the major hurdle to a Romney nomination.
If Romney should become the GOP Presidential candidate, the key question will be: Will conservative Christians so inclined put aside their faith-based bias against Mormons, and vote for Romney? Or, will they stay home and cut off their collective nose to spite their face?
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Slush Fund Nobody Voted For
- Hacktivism and the Possibility of WW III
- Illegals Working for Congress?
- Should FBI Agents Learn Martial Arts?
- Deep-State Sabotage in the DoD?
- What DOGE Is Accomplishing
- From Churchill to Vance...Sounding Off About Tyranny
- Globalist Games: They Play, We Pay
- Scorched-Earth Disease Control
- NATO, Ukraine, and the War Hawks’ Pixie Dust Playbook
Blog Posts
- The Obamas' podcast bombs
- Mark Kelly exposes the hypocrisy behind the Democrats’ electric vehicle fixation
- Washington state attorney general is mad at sheriff's office for complying with federal law
- Can Trump and the team really win?
- The Democrat party is in dire need of shock therapy in the form of hard truths
- CNN wants you to know that Biden did not strand the astronauts Musk is rescuing
- Could Rahm Emanuel be the Democrats' great hope for 2028?
- The South African ambassador’s fate shows that America will no longer be bullied
- Nvidia: The Vera and Fritz chips
- A track attack
- Dem violence and manhood
- Ending the Fed
- Hey Chuck, you need a tune-up
- Kari Lake is kickin' it at USAGM and its Voice of America subsidiary
- We’re not living in a Smoot-Hawley world, and smart tariffs will benefit America