March 10, 2011
Budget Cuts Lingo, Stranger Than Fiction
Yesterday, the Senate Democrats soundly defeated the attempts by the Republicans in the House to implement a very minute cut for the 2012 federal budget. Referring to the approximately $61 billion that the GOP was recommending (a mere 1.6% when compared to the $3,700 billion budget being proposed) the Democrats "emphatically rejected a budget-slashing House spending bill as too draconian."
Yes, you read that right, a 1.6% cut is deemed "draconian." The party of "it depends on what the definition of "is" is", is once again re-defining the meaning of language and distorting reality to promote its scorched earth political agenda.
It appears that America is rapidly being transformed into an Orwellian caricature. The leftists who now dominate the Democrat party simply refuse to deal with the ominous fiscal dangers ahead and continue to shove the country towards bankruptcy. Simple concepts like common sense, fairness, reason, and pragmatism no longer exist for these politicians. Even the basic precepts of the English language are no longer applicable.
In the interest of fairness and balance, a budget cuts language reference guide is in order.
Budget Cuts - Sanity version
------------------------------------
Minute = 1-1.6%
Minor = 1.7-3%
Small = 4-6%
Average = 7-10%
Large = 11-15%
Significant = 16-20%
Serious = 21-25%
Drastic = 26-30%
Severe = 31-35%
Draconian = 36-40%
Budget Cuts - Insanity version
------------------------------------
Draconian = 1-1.6%
Catastrophic = 2-3%
Demonic = 4-5%
Apocalyptic = 6-10%
------------------------------------
Minute = 1-1.6%
Minor = 1.7-3%
Small = 4-6%
Average = 7-10%
Large = 11-15%
Significant = 16-20%
Serious = 21-25%
Drastic = 26-30%
Severe = 31-35%
Draconian = 36-40%
Budget Cuts - Insanity version
------------------------------------
Draconian = 1-1.6%
Catastrophic = 2-3%
Demonic = 4-5%
Apocalyptic = 6-10%
Chris Banescu blogs at chrisbanescu.com.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
- Dismissing Evil and Denying the Holocaust — What’s the Endgame?
- The Witkoff Warning: Will Jordan’s King Fall?
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
Blog Posts
- Two new revelations about the Signal leak, along with two theories
- Big Tech’s Invisible Hand: How Google and Meta manipulate our elections
- New report: Netherlands is now euthanizing minors
- Tantalizing tidbits: Five news stories about leftists, and sea lions, acting aggressively
- Rockets to Roses: Israel’s bizarre trade cycle with Aza
- Fort Knox? Gold cams!
- There is no birthright citizenship for illegal aliens
- Turn off the phone. Close the laptop.
- Nine reasons Democrats are doomed to irrelevance
- Wagner College should restore Trump’s honorary degree—and set a national example against cancel culture
- The Signal Scandal was a nothingburger, but the WSJ takes the opportunity to attack Vance
- The Trump effect: An unprecedented investment surge and economic renewal
- Hydrocarbon-friendly Trump a match for energy-hungry India
- And Big Bird can’t sing
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction