« Revealed: CBS reporter victim of horrible assault in Tahrir Square (updated) | No recession at the IRS »
PrintFebruary 16, 2011
Pew Center carbon tax drivel
Congressional Republicans should stop trying to block the Environmental Protection Agency from imposing carbon taxes on American industry because a similar proposal was floated by George W. Bush's EPA administrator.
So argues Eileen Claussen, a longtime Washington bureaucrat and now president of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, in yesterday's Politico.
Claussen's argument is typical of the drivel that passes for smart among the ossified brains of men and women too long in the nation's capitol. Perhaps brains not ossified as much as arrested. Ms. Claussen's argument has the telltale signs of the juvenile.
Claussen's argument is typical of the drivel that passes for smart among the ossified brains of men and women too long in the nation's capitol. Perhaps brains not ossified as much as arrested. Ms. Claussen's argument has the telltale signs of the juvenile.
As I follow Claussenian reasoning, since a Republican President appointed an EPA administrator who floated a proposal to cripple American business and industry with carbon taxes, Republican Congressmen are practicing a high degree of hypocrisy by opposing the same under a Democrat President. Evidently, congressional Republicans aren't lemming-like enough.
Perhaps after review and reconsideration -- and four years of wandering in the political wilderness -- the 2011 crop of congressional Republicans realize that carbon taxes are ruinous. Perhaps carbon taxes inevitably become taxes on 300 million consumers, indirectly through much higher costs on virtually everything.
Perhaps in a bad economy made much worse by Democrat President Barack Obama, congressional Republicans have awakened to the murder that carbon taxes would do to the economy.
Perhaps these new GOP congressmen know global warming or climate change is junk science. Perhaps Republicans see the agenda hidden behind all the concern for our ever-so fragile environment: a desire by the left to engineer unprecedented big government.
Perhaps congressional Republicans are thinking.
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- A Taste of the Swamp
- Do We Have 677 Unelected Presidents?
- Global Relations beyond the Prime Directive
- The Democrat Party: The Enemy Within?
- Tariffs and the Moral High Ground
- ‘Mahmoud Khalil, Who Are You?’
- The Slush Fund Nobody Voted For
- Hacktivism and the Possibility of WW III
- Illegals Working for Congress?
- Should FBI Agents Learn Martial Arts?
Blog Posts
- Carville tells Democrats to quit making asses of themselves
- About that Texas congressman who called the transgender member of Congress 'Mister' ...
- A federal district court judge erases Trump’s ability to rid the country of enemy aliens
- In the UK, rape gangs are OK, pictures of women sans hijabs not so much
- Bacha Bazi still being practiced in Afghanistan; young boys sexually abused
- UN judge convicted of forcing a woman into indentured servitude
- What are capital gains, really?
- Trump begins restoring law and order
- Purge the poison: End Middle East Studies
- The Godfather: 53 and getting better all the time
- Why aren't Johnny and Suzie reading?
- ActBlue smurfs its way to oblivion
- Hunter Biden hotfoots it to a luxury vacation in South Africa, seemingly to avoid a deposition on his claimed poverty
- The Obamas' podcast bombs
- Did Stacey Abrams’s NGO really get $2 billion for appliances to hand out to Americans?