Another huge protest in Cairo
The Egyptians are calling it "Day of Departure" for Mubarak but the hundreds of thousands in the streets and Tahrir Square will probably be disappointed by days end.
The army, unlike the last couple of days, seems determined to keep a lid on violence, mostly by preventing pro-Mubarak forces from gathering in the Square. The BBC:
Volunteers and soldiers are putting on a highly organised operation. They are searching everyone who enters the square to make sure they have no weapons. There is even a separate queue for women - I was patted down apologetically several times.The numbers have swelled again, with tens of thousands joining the crowd. There are shouts and whistles, and more cries of "Leave, leave Mubarak!" Despite all the government's concessions, the message remains unchanged.
After more fighting in the north of the square overnight, the mood is peaceful and there are more women and children here than in the past couple of days.
Instead, the bullies seem to have found another place to demonstrate:
Our correspondent says the mood is relaxed but it is not quite the carnival atmosphere that existed before Wednesday - when pro-Mubarak gangs attacked anti-government protesters - and people are watchful.There were no signs of supporters of the president in the square on Friday, but about 2,000 are holding a demonstration in Mustafa Mahmoud square in the Mohandiseen district. A BBC correspondent says they are waving Egyptian flags and chanting "Yes to Mubarak, yes to stability".
Meanwhile, in Egypt's second city of Alexandria, there are also many more tanks and soldiers out on the streets there than before, reports the BBC's Wyre Davies.
The atmosphere ahead of Friday prayers and another big opposition demonstration was palpably tense and serious, our correspondent says.
A number of armed police - both in uniform and plain clothes - were seen near the main square. One was dragged away by a crowd of protesters, beaten up and bundled into a car.
The administration's efforts to get Mubarak to go have been futile:
"What they're asking cannot be done," one senior Egyptian official said, citing clauses in the Egyptian Constitution that bar the vice president from assuming power. Under the Constitution, the speaker of Parliament would succeed the president. "That's my technical answer," the official added. "My political answer is they should mind their own business."
I'd call that a snub, wouldn't you?
Mubarak seems to be firming up his grip on power. The army is 100% behind him and the crisis seems to have ebbed a bit. If the international community bands together to deny aid to Egypt until Mubarak goes, that might get the military thinking about sending their president into exile.
But what are the chances of the international community being united in such an effort? Slim and none.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Why Do Democrats Hate Women and Girls?
- There is No Politics Without an Enemy
- On the Importance of President Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’
- Let a Robot Do It
- I Am Woman
- Slaying the University Dragons
- Canada Embraces European Suicide
- A Multi-Point Attack on the National Debt
- Nearing the Final Battle Against the Deep State
- Now’s the Time to Buy a Nuke (Nuclear Power Plant, That Is)
Blog Posts
- California voters introduce new health care ‘access’ ballot initiative named after Luigi Mangione
- ‘American Oversight’? What a joke!
- Pete Hegseth in the line of fire—again
- Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is accused of plagiarizing parts of his Oxford thesis
- France goes the Full Maduro, bans leading opposition frontrunner, Marine Le Pen, from running for the presidency
- Bob Lighthizer’s case for tariffs
- An eye for an eye, an order for order
- Peace on the Dnieper?
- Tesla protestor banner: 'Burn a Tesla, save democracy'
- Pro-abortionists amplify an aborton protest's impact
- A broken system waiting to crash
- The U.S. Navy on the border
- Rep. Jasmine Crockett opens her mouth again
- Buried lede: San Francisco has lost 60,000 tourism-related jobs
- I’ve recognized manipulation in the past, and I see it now on the Supreme Court