January 6, 2011
Vandalizing American Culture
It turns out that Huck Finn and his author are no longer politically correct. Publisher New South Books has decided that the "N-word" must be stricken in favor of the word "slave" in the to-be-published addition of Huck Finn along with the word, "Injun" or perhaps what should be called the "I-word
What has become of us? More preciously, what has become of American historical perspective?
Shelby Foote, the noted Civil War historian in the Ken Burns famous documentary about the Civil War noted that an understanding about American today must be firmly bedded in an understanding of the Civil War. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBghmvRMluY at 0:24 to 1:13]]. He was right. How does any society understand itself today without firmly understanding its past whether the Civil War or any other American national tragedy?
Mark Twain's Huck Finn is probably the best novel ever written about the times prior to the Civil War, and better than any other novel of the 19th century in my opinion. Mr. Twain, [or Mr. Samuel Clemens for purists] painstakingly undertook to write dialogue in the dialect of the people of those times. If you read the dialogue out loud today, you hear what the people spoke like in those days so long ago. A picture forms in your mind of who they were, what they stood for and how they thought. Not so pleasant at times to be sure, but I believe Mr. Clemens meant his book to not be so pleasant at all times. He gave us an historical and cultural understanding whence we came; not all of it was good, though much of it was.
Today we deplore the "N-word," and so we should, because of this historical connection Huck Finn provides. I suppose I should also deplore the "I-word," but as I am a native American (to use the politically correct term), I personally don't care, though others truly do. However, that's not the point. One could never know nor understand why these words today are offensive without the historical context that Mr. Clemens so richly provides. To deprive anyone of this richness is the crime that desensitizes such an understanding rather than educates.
If Huck Finn must be "Corrected," don't. Put a well written article in the preface to the new edition explaining the cultural past and its effects today. But leave the historical significance alone. We must remember our past to know ourselves today.
What has become of us? More preciously, what has become of American historical perspective?
Shelby Foote, the noted Civil War historian in the Ken Burns famous documentary about the Civil War noted that an understanding about American today must be firmly bedded in an understanding of the Civil War. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBghmvRMluY at 0:24 to 1:13]]. He was right. How does any society understand itself today without firmly understanding its past whether the Civil War or any other American national tragedy?
Mark Twain's Huck Finn is probably the best novel ever written about the times prior to the Civil War, and better than any other novel of the 19th century in my opinion. Mr. Twain, [or Mr. Samuel Clemens for purists] painstakingly undertook to write dialogue in the dialect of the people of those times. If you read the dialogue out loud today, you hear what the people spoke like in those days so long ago. A picture forms in your mind of who they were, what they stood for and how they thought. Not so pleasant at times to be sure, but I believe Mr. Clemens meant his book to not be so pleasant at all times. He gave us an historical and cultural understanding whence we came; not all of it was good, though much of it was.
Today we deplore the "N-word," and so we should, because of this historical connection Huck Finn provides. I suppose I should also deplore the "I-word," but as I am a native American (to use the politically correct term), I personally don't care, though others truly do. However, that's not the point. One could never know nor understand why these words today are offensive without the historical context that Mr. Clemens so richly provides. To deprive anyone of this richness is the crime that desensitizes such an understanding rather than educates.
If Huck Finn must be "Corrected," don't. Put a well written article in the preface to the new edition explaining the cultural past and its effects today. But leave the historical significance alone. We must remember our past to know ourselves today.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Biden's National Censorship Regime
- Four Years, Five Fiascos: The Toll of Government Overreach
- The Legacy of the Roberts Court
- Parental Rights at Risk from Tyrannical State Overreach
- Alexander Hamilton: A Brilliant and Conflicted Leader
- The Death of the Center-Left in America
- ‘Make Peace, You Fools! What Else Can You Do?’
- When Nuclear Regulation Goes Awry
- The Danger of Nothing
- A New Pope With Courage
Blog Posts
- Britain bans French philosopher who conceptualized the 'great replacement' theory, from entering country
- AOC versus visionary leadership
- The color revolution waged by our judiciary
- Fredi Otto, the new Greta Thunberg
- Why Democrats should become Republicans
- Terrorism works?
- Are we prepared for a new Chinese period of the warring states?
- Trump challenges the Fed
- The last Austrian standing
- Tim Walz: helping China colonize Minnesota?
- Another insubordinate officer?
- Keeping terrorists in America
- Celebrate Earth Day by not burning a Tesla
- Minnesota state bureaucrat charged with vandalizing Teslas to the tune of $20,000 is let off scot-free
- Trump’s plan for Gaza vs. the New York Times