By the Numbers: CBO Stats that the Left Won't Like
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) is out with new numbers today regarding economic growth and budget issues for the years to come. The Left's take-away of all this (illustrated here, here and here) is that the Obama/Republican tax cut is pushing the 2011 deficit to a record $1.5 trillion.
Claiming that tax cuts "cost" money, is similar to someone claiming that Wall Mart - in net - is losing revenue by having low prices. The fact however is that lower prices spur growth as seen by the size and success of Wall Mart. Setting aside this common sense argument, is it worthy to note that the Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 deficit excluding the "cost" of the tax cuts, is expected to be $1.1 trillion. How bad is this? Combining all four budget deficits before Obama became president (ending with FY 2008) totaled $1.1 trillion. So spare me the crocodile tears, my fellow Dems.
Here are some other CBO numbers that the tax-cut-to-blame-for-deficit reports may have missed:
The CBO projections are based on the assumptions, between others, that "sharp reductions in Medicare's payment rates for physicians' services take effect as scheduled at the end of 2011." These cuts as part of ObamaCare "savings" were to take place in early 2010, yet the Democrats pushed it back to the end of 2011, which means - as I wrote here on American Thinker - large parts of the ObamaCare savings are already out the window, yet Dems shamelessly still repeat the old CBO savings numbers.
The unemployment rate at the end of 2012 - presidential election time - is expected to stand at 8.2%. This is higher than the 7.8% of the month Obama became president, and higher than the Obama staff Stimulus projections which called for the Rate to be now 7% and down to 5% at the end of 2012.
Gross Domestic Product (GDP, economic) growth year over year, is expected to be 3.1% in 2011, and another 2.8% the following year. By contrast, President Reagan at the same time of his tenure, following the then-worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, had GDP growth of 7.2 in 1983 and 4.1 percent the following year.
With economic projections expected to be so weak in the next two years, it is unclear to me why Republicans would want to take credit for it, instead of hammering Obama for producing such a weak economy despite all his stimulus, spending and investments.
Contact: yossi@yossigestetner.com
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- A Ph.D. in ‘Molecular and Cell Biology’ shows the difference between credentials and knowledge
- Nasty Venezuelan migrant who flashed taxpayer dollars and urged squatting, gets thrown out
- Watch white leftist women’s brains breaking—and repairing—in real-time
- The last, best hope ...
- In Pennsylvania, are Democrats stealing votes again?
- Knife control comes to the U.K.: Prime Minister Starmer bans Ninja swords
- This Tuesday, Wisconsonites must vote for Brad Schimel for the State Supreme Court
- Was Vietnam worth the cost?
- Democrats should get a clue from the Palestinians who are now marching against Hamas
- Trump takes on Fauxahontas's brainchild
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.