Beijing plans for Preemptive Nuclear Strike
China spent a great deal of money on its military during the past few years, and in 2010 alone, the budget reached 10.2 trillion yen, about 123 billion U.S. dollars. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) may not have an “operational, domestically-produced carrier and associated ships before 2015,’ but is it producing a stealth aircraft and a carrier ‘killing’ missile. Along with these military goodies, the PLA has decided to spice up its nuclear strategic policy:
The Chinese military will consider launching a preemptive nuclear strike if the country finds itself faced with a critical situation in a war with another nuclear state, internal documents showed Wednesday.
[…]
The People's Liberation Army's strategic missile forces, the Second Artillery Corps, ''will adjust the nuclear threat policy if a nuclear missile-possessing country carries out a series of air strikes against key strategic targets in our country with absolutely superior conventional weapons…''
As we can see this policy shows China to be in ‘defensive’ position, we must keep in mind that it doesn’t seem to matter—policy-wise—who started the war. The Chinese military, ‘preemptively’ has considered itself a ‘poor loser’ and is darn well going to be the one to finish the war.
Reported by the Kyodo News, this policy “is likely to fan concern in the United States, Japan and other regional powers about Beijing's nuclear capability.”
Oh, really? But yes, it should be a concern, considering the existential qualities of the government in Beijing, being that the government is the god, and that the last time the U.S. dealt with a similar godless entity, it was in the USSR.
Now, Preemptive Nuclear Strike sounds suspiciously like Nuclear First Strike, whether we like it or not. The circumstances outlined by the PLA could easily evolve into something akin to Soviet Strategic Nuclear policy:
“The Soviet-led Warsaw Pact had a long-standing strategy to attack Western Europe that included being the first to use nuclear weapons, […] Although the aim was apparently to preempt NATO "aggression," the Soviets clearly expected that nuclear war was likely and planned specifically to fight and win such a conflict.”

Is it time to panic, maybe not, but it’s not too late to learn from history.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Russia Tariff Canard
- When The Government Brutalizes Children
- Trump’s Global Bunker Buster Day
- Phone-Free Schools: Banning Phones to Protect Schoolchildren
- Out-of-Control Courts
- ‘Democracy,’ Establishment Style
- The Truth About Trump’s Tariff Revisions … It’s All About 'The Art of the Deal'
- Remember, MAGA: This is No Time to Go Wobbly
- The Hill of Lies
- Trump’s Tariff Play: The Art of the Economic Reset
Blog Posts
- Rep. Jasmine Crockett calls on illegals to pick her cotton because 'we done picking cotton'
- Two…men…advance to women’s pool championship
- Let’s talk about the economic collapse and recession that aren’t happening
- Where were all the ‘protesters’ during Biden’s years in office?
- Progressivism is an auto-immune disease
- Time to tariff up: Stop funding our own collapse
- Major victory from SCOTUS in Trump deportation case
- Mississippi on the move
- We called him ‘Daniel el travieso’
- The Supreme Court affirms Justice Boasberg lacked jurisdiction over Trump’s deportation decision under the Alien Enemies Act
- DOGE spirit moves downstream -- to new U.S. Attorney who vows to probe the billions lost to L.A.'s homeless industrial complex
- A majority of self-identified leftists think political assassination is a societal good
- One Democrat has an idea for winning: a new ‘Contract with America’
- Kash Patel promotes an FBI agent who called J6 patriots and moms at school board meetings ‘terrorists’
- Tariffs threaten to put the nail in the ‘green’ energy coffin