November 23, 2010
Show us the data
Much is now being made about the new TSA regulations and practice's being employed at airports. But if these new scanners and, alternatively, the sanctioned gropes going on are effective, how many arrests have been made? How many bombs or weapons have they found? Why don't we have this info?
So far the only arrest I have heard of was a guy who refused the searches. Why are we so willing to allow the government to chip away at our sovereignty without adequately giving us cause?
Here in Michigan, my home state, they banned using cell phones to send texts while driving. Now everybody knows that it is dangerous to do that. But how dangerous?
When we were debating this I did some checking. I was looking for stats that I expected would show an increase in accidents since the advent of wide spread cell phone use. I found none. I even checked with the insurance industry, who you would think would be all over this since they keep stats on accidents as part of their business and they are the ones paying the claims. They had nothing to say about cell phone use contributing to an increase in accidents and there was no corresponding increase in insurance rates.
Now, let me acknowledge I think using cell phones while driving increases your chances of being in an accident. And it is possible that the TSA announcing and emphasizing tough new screening will probably discourage terrorists from showing up at the airport in the first place.
But what is missing is the rational decision process backed up with hard evidence. Where are the stats supporting these measures? If they don't exist why are we so willing to give up more or our liberties, bit by bit, without some darn good verification these measures are effective.
Is it possible this is just another political display not intended to make us safer, just make us think we are? Is the goal here to increase safety, or confidence in this government?
Reagan famously said "Trust but verify". We need to put our trust in the verification some hard stats would give rather than the Obama administration and the lack of same. This whole episode should make us think twice before we meekly consent to these assaults on our liberties.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
- Malicious Imbeciles
- Face the Nonsense, Again: Margaret Brennan’s ‘You Should Watch the News’ Moment
- Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
- The Activist Judges Who Think They Outrank the President
- Dismantling USAID Services in Africa
- There Are EVs And There Are Teslas. They Are Not The Same.
Blog Posts
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction
- Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
- Payback: J.D. Vance calmly gives Denmark a real reason to be paranoid since they're asking for it
- Political shenanigans in Texas
- Jasmine Crockett tries to backpedal her ‘hot wheels’ comment about a wheelchair-bound Gov. Abbott, forgets the internet archives exist
- Signal debacle – maybe intentional
- Trump’s executive orders have big leftist law firms running scared
- In Denmark, Americans have become 'the deplorables'
- Mike Huckabee and a turning point in US-Israel relations
- Up is down, down is up!
- Who will thaw the Arctic?
- Do trans people expect us to abandon common sense?
- Impeach the judges
- How Mississippi eliminated the income tax
- The ‘agua’ battle on the border