The president's abortion lies
The regularity of the President’s lies requires that they be mentioned to remind us of the moral standard to which the US Presidency will return.
Peggy Noonan highlighted David Axelrod’s attempt last week to insert abortion into the November election discussion. She accurately described it as cynical and desperate.
Even before that, in an Albuquerque back yard, Barack Obama launched his abortion election strategy by saying he wished abortion was “safe, legal and rare.”
For most people, the choices in this debate are A) abortion is murder/pro-life or B) abortion is not murder/pro-choice. The rarer choice that Camille Paglia once highlighted is C) abortion is murder/pro-choice – horrible but honest.
Given Barack Obama’s support of partial birth abortions, we can safely assume he is pro-choice and hopefully an option B, not murder/pro-choice person.
This is where the lie becomes obvious. If you believe abortion is murder, you desire it rare and illegal. If, on the other hand, you believe abortion is not murder and are pro-choice, you would like it be anything but rare. After all, harmless choice is good, should be common and certainly legal.
With the exception of Option C people, no pro choicer should logically want abortion rare. President Obama’s abortion subsidies in his Mexico City Policy decision, defunding of abstinence education and Obamacare clearly show he aims to make abortion more common. So the President is lying when he states a preference for rare abortions.
The President’s deceptions are common enough to suggest more than just far left ideology and a simple disdain for public intelligence. This latest “safe, legal and rare” charade is blatant nonsense, particularly knowing what we know about the President’s abortion record. Even the arrogant check their logic, can this guy not help himself?
The frequency, transparency and contradictions of the President’s false statements suggest not only a pathological tendency but a logical confusion and mental incoherence. At recent measure, the President’s credibility was 22%. How low can it go?

FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- What’s the Real Target of the Assault on Tesla?
- MAGA: Progress, Not Perfection
- Saving American Culture through ‘Counter-Spoliation’
- Anecdotes from the Time of Autism
- War Is Hell
- Deep State Anatomy and Physiology
- Sisterhood of the Traveling Pronouns
- Trump’s Tariffs: A Chance to Bring Back Lost Jobs
- Trump's Six-Point Plan for Making America Great Again
- Make IRS Sauce The Same For Both Citizen Goose and Politician Gander
Blog Posts
- The Democrats’ superiority complex
- On Wisconsin: The pundit class fumbles (again)
- Around the world, the smart way and the dumb way to respond to Trump's tariffs
- Burning Teslas
- Senator, you talk too much
- The Atlantic's phony migrant tear-jerker about a pitiful 'Maryland father' shipped back to El Salvador falls apart
- Rep. Luna, forgets she’s on the Republican Team!
- Veruca Salt politics or the inevitable result of ‘the personal is political’
- Taliban justice in the streets of Bordeaux, and a Sharia ‘mega city’ comes to Texas
- French judge releases an accused rapist because he’s ‘fairly integrated’
- The Luigi cult is still out there, gushing and festering
- In New York, a tax service company targets illegal aliens as potential customers for child tax credits
- When antisemitic leftists play the ‘Jewish card’
- FDA’s vaccine-rubberstamp Peter Marks forced to resign, and Big Pharma stocks take a nosedive
- Will Colorado pass what’s essentially a ‘trans blasphemy’ bill? *UPDATED*