« US Soldier at Fort Hood in Uniform Attacks Service as Islamophobic | Another American Imam can't say whether Hamas is a terrorist organization »
August 26, 2010
Tax Dollars for Mosques!
This U.S. Department of State Bureau of Educational & Cultural Affairs document itemizes the six million American tax dollars being spent to restore 63 historic and cultural sites, including Islamic mosques and minarets all over the world. Is the title of the article "Obama gives your tax dollars to rebuild Muslim mosques around the world" an inflammatory one or not?
With so many Americans teetering on economic ruin, why is this money leaving the country? It doesn't help the economy or the American worker. Is the restoration of a 19th century minaret in the ancient city of Tichitt, Mauritania going to help the laid off worker in Detroit, Michigan?
Nicole Thompson, a State Department spokeswoman, has said that this cultural preservation "is helping to preserve our cultural heritage. It is not just to preserve religious structures. It is not to preserve a religion. It's to help us as global inhabitants preserve cultures."
As multicultural Americans, isn't it important to be caretakers of the ancient world and understand and learn from these structures?
Still others would ask, if American doctrine entails a separation of church and state, why are tax dollars being spent to assist in any religious monument, however well meant. Isn't this a flagrant violation of American doctrine?
Apparently the funding of such projects became acceptable in 2003 when the Justice Department "declared that the U.S. Constitution's Establishment Clause did not preclude federal funds from going to preserve religious structures if they had cultural importance."
How, then, does one define "cultural importance?"
The DOJ wrote "[t]he establishment clause of the U.S. Constitution permits the government to include religious objects and sites within an aid program under certain conditions. For example, an item with a religious connection (including a place of worship) may be the subject of a cultural preservation grant if the item derives its primary significance and is nominated solely on the basis of architectural, artistic, historical or other cultural (not religious) criteria.'"
But how does one make sense of the Code of Federal Regulations which states that, "USAID funds may not be used for the acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of structures to the extent that those structures are used for inherently religious activities."
Does the State Department ever follow up and investigate if the site is being used for religious activities? If it is, does the site gets closed down? What else is a mosque or church used for or are these sites meant for scholarly pursuits and tourists?
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton calls this diplomatic effort and outreach, "soft power." Whose soft power?
If Islamic cultural and religious sites are in disrepair, where are the wealthy oil-producing countries in all this renovation?
Why isn't the United Nations involved in such a project -- it would seem more appropriate that they, who represent all the nations of the world, would band together and fix the cultural antiquities of the global community?
Certain organizations are requesting that Americans contact their representatives to condemn this use of American taxpayer dollars to rebuild Islamic mosques overseas.
Still others who have a deep and abiding respect for the preservation of important cultural sites say it is wrong to politicize this outreach program.
What say you?
Eileen can be reached at middlemarch18@gmail.com
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Trump's Evolution
- Fight Gender Ideology, and You Go to War
- Senators: Don’t Be Colombia
- Conservative Publishing is Making a Comeback
- Trump is not a Fascist
- Democrats for Infanticide
- Erasing Humanity, One Face at a Time
- Dismantling The Administrative State Is A Critical Task Requiring Great Effort
- De Gaulle Set a Pattern For Trump
- How Trump is Already Cleaning up Ukraine
Blog Posts
- Fossil fuel and the end of human chattel slavery
- Clarity and security in Trump’s repurposing of Guantanamo Bay
- Islamists can't be trusted
- Trump’s hat tip to citizen journalism
- When ‘economists’ complain about Trump’s policies
- Just how disgusting were Democrats to RFK, Jr. at his hearing?
- Is the climate doomsday cult finally losing power?
- A pocket guide to why Trump is correct on birthright citizenship
- Israel, not Palestine, is the side that fights back -- but the Washington Post reports it backwards
- It reminds me of my days in Cuba
- A whistleblower beats the Garland DOJ
- Larry Krasner: the lawfare is strong in this one
- Will California succeed in secession?
- Amy Wax: Penn's antisemitism is going to cost them
- Jackasses in action: Senate confirmation hearings for RFK, Jr. commence -- and it sounds like a zoo