Does the NY Times expect Israel to commit suicide?
In its June 2 edition, the New York Times editorially suggests two solutions to put Israel back in the good graces of the international community -- an "impartial international investigation" of the commando raid and a permanent lifting of Israel's blockade of Hamas-ruled Gaza. Israel, however, is not about to buy either idea.
.
The first one is an oxymoron, as attested by the UN's slanderous and discredited Goldstone investigation of the 2008 Gaza war. Unfortunately, in today's world, "international" and "impartial" are mutually exclusive terms.
As for removing the blockade, this would be a suicidal step for Israel because it would permit Hamas to expand its weapons arsenal exponentially and thus facilitate its stated objective of eliminating the Jewish state.
So, thanks, editors of the New York Times. But no thanks.
LEO RENNERT
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Biden's National Censorship Regime
- Four Years, Five Fiascos: The Toll of Government Overreach
- The Legacy of the Roberts Court
- Parental Rights at Risk from Tyrannical State Overreach
- Alexander Hamilton: A Brilliant and Conflicted Leader
- The Death of the Center-Left in America
- ‘Make Peace, You Fools! What Else Can You Do?’
- When Nuclear Regulation Goes Awry
- The Danger of Nothing
- A New Pope With Courage
Blog Posts
- Britain bans French philosopher who conceptualized the 'great replacement' theory, from entering country
- AOC versus visionary leadership
- The color revolution waged by our judiciary
- Fredi Otto, the new Greta Thunberg
- Why Democrats should become Republicans
- Terrorism works?
- Are we prepared for a new Chinese period of the warring states?
- Trump challenges the Fed
- The last Austrian standing
- Tim Walz: helping China colonize Minnesota?
- Another insubordinate officer?
- Keeping terrorists in America
- Celebrate Earth Day by not burning a Tesla
- Minnesota state bureaucrat charged with vandalizing Teslas to the tune of $20,000 is let off scot-free
- Trump’s plan for Gaza vs. the New York Times