On taxes, Hillary should put her money where her mouth is
So, Hillary Clinton believe s the rich are selfish if they don't want to share their wealth by paying higher taxes.
Clinton said the comment was her personal opinion. "I'm not speaking for the administration, so I'll preface that with a very clear caveat," she said.
Does the very rich Secretary of State Clinton act on her personal opinion by putting her money where her mouth is? Because the Clintons are quite rich indeed. According to an estimate in the Atlantic, the Clintons are very rich--worth an estimated $38 million. Richer than me; richer than you?
Despite being born to a poor Arkansas family and essentially raised by his grandparents after his father died in an automobile accident and his mother more or less abandoned her son while she did her thing for extended periods of time, Clinton managed to obtain an Ivy League law degree thanks to his hard work and innate intelligence. (Clinton's story has some striking parallels to that of the current president.) Hillary, an equally hard worker with basic smarts, from a solid middle class family, managed to do the same.
Clinton was born with no inheritance, and he made little significant money during 20 plus years of public service. After his time in White House, however, he made a substantial income as an author and public speaker. Clinton received large advance from autobiography. His wife, the secretary of state, has also made money as author.
According to their released tax returns from 2000-2008
The Clintons paid $33,783,507 in federal taxes - 31% of their adjusted gross income.
These seemingly impressive figures mean that less than 1/3 of the Clintons' income went to the US Treasury in taxes. Is that what she means by fair share? In England, with its Clinton role model socialized medicine, over half of the Clintons gross income would have been devoured by taxes.
So Hillary, set an example. Pay your fair share of taxes. Pay more. Pay up.

FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- A Ph.D. in ‘Molecular and Cell Biology’ shows the difference between credentials and knowledge
- Nasty Venezuelan migrant who flashed taxpayer dollars and urged squatting, gets thrown out
- Watch white leftist women’s brains breaking—and repairing—in real-time
- The last, best hope ...
- In Pennsylvania, are Democrats stealing votes again?
- Knife control comes to the U.K.: Prime Minister Starmer bans Ninja swords
- This Tuesday, Wisconsonites must vote for Brad Schimel for the State Supreme Court
- Was Vietnam worth the cost?
- Democrats should get a clue from the Palestinians who are now marching against Hamas
- Trump takes on Fauxahontas's brainchild
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.