Pelosi was against the Slaughter Rule before she was for it

Mark Tapscott of the Washington Examiner reports that in 2005, when the GOP used the "self executing" rule (Slaughter Rule) to raise the debt ceiling, a liberal activist group went to court on behalf of Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats to stop it.

In their brief, Public Citizen argued:

"Article I of the United States Constitution requires that before proposed legislation may "become[] a Law," U.S. CONST. art. I, § 7, cl. 2, "(1) a bill containing its exact text [must be] approved by a majority of the Members of the House of Representatives; (2) the Senate [must] approve[] precisely the same text; and (3) that text [must be] signed into law by the President," Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417, 448, 118 S.Ct. 2091, 141 L.Ed.2d 393 (1998).

"Public Citizen, a not-for-profit consumer advocacy organization, filed suit in District Court claiming that the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, Pub.L. No. 109-171, 120 Stat. 4 (2006) ("DRA" or "Act"), is invalid because the bill that was presented to the President did not first pass both chambers of Congress in the exact same form. In particular, Public Citizen contends that the statute's enactment did not comport with the bicameral passage requirement of Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution, because the version of the legislation that was presented to the House contained a clerk's error with respect to one term, so the House and Senate voted on slightly different versions of the bill and the President signed the version passed by the Senate.

Tapscott points out that joining PC with amicus briefs were Nancy Pelosi and Louise Slaughter.


Hat Tip: Ed Lasky






If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com