March 4, 2010
Moderate, or Blind Monkey?
Congressmen can be, and often are, judged by their voting records. The American Conservative Union, for example, scores senators every year by their votes in 25 particular roll calls. A senator who voted "conservative" in 20 of 25 roll calls and "liberal" in the other five, for example, would be given a score of 80 - the percentage of his votes that were "conservative."
A blind monkey would, presumably, vote randomly each roll call -- the same as flipping an honest coin. Thus, in 25 roll calls, a blind monkey would be most likely to score 48 or 52. Thus, a typical blind monkey would be considered a political "moderate."
Statisticians have a test to determine if a coin is indeed honest. If you flip an honest coin 25 times, you would have less than a 5% chance (in fact, a 4.32% chance) of getting fewer than eight or more than 17 heads. Statisticians would then say your coin is honest, at the 5% level of significance, if you flipped at least 8, or at most 17, heads in 25 flips. (A 5% level of significance is considered reasonable for such tests.)
Applying this rule to senators, a senator's ACU score between 32 and 68 (inclusive) makes that senator's voting record indistinguishable from that of a blind monkey at the 5% level of significance (neglecting missed votes). In 2009, there were seven such senators. Those senators are listed below, with ACU scores, in order of increasing distinguishability from a blind monkey.
- Snowe (R-Maine, 48)
- Collins (R-Maine, 48)
- Ben Nelson (D-Nebraska, 44)
- Bayh (D-Indiana, 40)
- Alexander (R-Tennessee, 68)
- Lugar (R-Indiana, 68)
- Murkowski (R-Alaska, 68)
Maine enjoys the unique situation of being represented in the US Senate by the two senators most indistinguishable from blind monkeys in their votes.
John McCain received an ACU score of 96 in 2009, the year just prior to his primary run for re-election in 2010. In 2008 he scored 63, indistinguishable from a blind monkey. His 2006 score was 65, also indistinguishable from a blind monkey. So John McCain was indistinguishable from a blind monkey in two of the last four years.
(The above analysis was not intended to cast aspersions on monkeys of any type, whether sighted or visually challenged.)
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Trump’s Chess Game Is Improving
- Trump Has the Taxpayers’ Back
- Downsizing the Federal Government
- Is There A Problem With Colorado State University And Its Nipah Virus Research?
- Media Titans Rattled by Lawsuits
- Tribalism: The Key to Understanding Islam
- Reaching for the Source of Meaning and Certitude
- The Musk-eteers Reveal You’ve Been Living in a Simulated Reality
- America Must, Can, And Should Renew Its Nuclear Energy Dominance
- Trump and the States Confront Digital Issues
Blog Posts
- Democrats decry Trump’s cancellation of ‘green’ subsidies because he’s ending a ‘low-cost’ industry
- Larry Summers and four other Democrat Treasury secretaries come out together to howl about DOGE
- Anti-white propagandists spread disinformation to spur race wars in South Africa
- Democrats are politically bipolar on illegal immigration
- Country as home
- Legos called ‘heteronormative,’ problematic
- President Trump addresses his largest TV audience ever during an interview before the Super Bowl yesterday
- Lawfare 2.0: A New York judge launches a coup
- Politically bipolar
- My experience with USAID and Israel
- Marco Rubio, not Obama, on Cuba
- Homeland Security Secretary Noem accuses FBI of leaking news of ICE raids to the press
- Rathergate at 21
- Revisiting Benghazi
- The Second Amendment: new Trumpian opportunities