Did the Senate Parliamentarian just save the day?
His name is Alan Frumin and he may be the hinge upon which the door to nationalized health care is slammed shut.
Frumin occupies a formerly obscure position in the senate, serving as parliamentarian to that body. It's his jobs to interpret the rules of the senate to insure that one side or the other does not take unfair advantage by skirting requirements for legislative debate and germaneness.
Right now, he may be the only person standing in the way of the Democrat's push to ram nationalized health care through to victory.
The Democrat's scheme to use reconciliation in order to placate House members who don't like several aspects of the bill the senate passed in the dead of night last December, has raised a couple of serious questions about parliamentary procedure. What the Democrats wanted to do was use reconciliation in both the House and Senate to push through amendments to the original senate bill before the House voted on it.
It's convoluted and counterintiuitive but made necessary by the simple fact that dozens of House members simply do not trust the senate to pass their "fixes" after the original senate bill is voted on and becomes law (after the president signs it). Their fears are well founded; why should senate Democrats put their neck on the block, blow up the chamber, further anger their constituents just to give House members political cover?
Hence, the Democrats were hoping that Frumin would rule that House Democrats could delay voting on the original senate bill until reconciliation had been completed.
Frumin lowered the hammer yesterday:
The Senate Parliamentarian has ruled that President Barack Obama must sign Congress' original health care reform bill before the Senate can act on a companion reconciliation package, senior GOP sources said Thursday.The Senate Parliamentarian's Office was responding to questions posed by the Republican leadership. The answers were provided verbally, sources said.House Democratic leaders have been searching for a way to ensure that any move they make to approve the Senate-passed $871 billion health care reform bill is followed by Senate action on a reconciliation package of adjustments to the original bill. One idea is to have the House and Senate act on reconciliation prior to House action on the Senate's original health care bill.Information Republicans say they have received from the Senate Parliamentarian's Office eliminates that option. House Democratic leaders last week began looking at crafting a legislative rule that would allow the House to approve the Senate health care bill, but not forward it to Obama for his signature until the Senate clears the reconciliation package.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Biden's National Censorship Regime
- Four Years, Five Fiascos: The Toll of Government Overreach
- The Legacy of the Roberts Court
- Parental Rights at Risk from Tyrannical State Overreach
- Alexander Hamilton: A Brilliant and Conflicted Leader
- The Death of the Center-Left in America
- ‘Make Peace, You Fools! What Else Can You Do?’
- When Nuclear Regulation Goes Awry
- The Danger of Nothing
- A New Pope With Courage
Blog Posts
- Media hypocrisy: Hegseth must go because he’ll get us all killed
- Britain bans French philosopher who conceptualized the 'great replacement' theory, from entering country
- AOC versus visionary leadership
- The color revolution waged by our judiciary
- Fredi Otto, the new Greta Thunberg
- Why Democrats should become Republicans
- Terrorism works?
- Are we prepared for a new Chinese period of the warring states?
- Trump challenges the Fed
- The last Austrian standing
- Tim Walz: helping China colonize Minnesota?
- Another insubordinate officer?
- Keeping terrorists in America
- Celebrate Earth Day by not burning a Tesla
- Minnesota state bureaucrat charged with vandalizing Teslas to the tune of $20,000 is let off scot-free