Mukasey on how not to deal with terrorists

Writing in the op ed pages of the Washington Post, former Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey clearly explains it all to you why the U.S.'s gentle treatment of the Christmas Day almost terrorist as a mere criminal was wrong.

There was thus no legal or policy compulsion to treat Abdulmutallab as a criminal defendant, at least initially, and every reason to treat him as an intelligence asset to be exploited promptly. The way to do that was not simply to have locally available field agents question him but, rather, to get in the room people who knew about al-Qaeda in Yemen, people who could obtain information, check that information against other available data and perhaps get feedback from others in the field before going back to Abdulmutallab to follow up where necessary, all the while keeping secret the fact of his cooperation. Once his former cohorts know he is providing information, they can act to make that information useless.

Mukasey was appointed by President George W. Bush; prior to that he was the judge in the initial proceedings against another would be terrorist, Jose Padilla, so he does have the experience and understanding of what is involved. And what has been lost.
If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

Most Read


Last 24 Hours

Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
Face the Nonsense, Again: Margaret Brennan’s ‘You Should Watch the News’ Moment
The Activist Judges Who Think They Outrank the President
There Are EVs And There Are Teslas. They Are Not The Same.

Last 7 Days

Righteous Attacks Bringing the Left to Heel
Is Dem Defector Lindy Li A Deep State Double Agent?
Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
Think USAID was bad? You ain't seen nothin' yet.
The Supreme Court Has Long Held That The Alien Enemies Act Gives The President Plenary Power