Intel officials; terrorist attack 'certain'
One of the problems with politicizing the War on Terror is that when government officials make statements like an attack is "certain," it's hard to know whether they actually have actionable intel that points to that conclusion or whether they are simply covering their behinds.
In fact, according to this story in The Hill by Jordy Yager, the feds have had no warning of any specific plot:
CIA Director Leon Panetta said the foremost risk was of another al Qaeda attack using recruits that have relatively low or "clean" profiles that are hard to detect."The biggest threat is not so much that we face an attack like 9/11," said Panetta. "It is that al Qaeda is adapting its methods in ways that oftentimes make it difficult to detect."
Panetta's warning came at the Senate Intelligence Committee's annual threat assessment hearing.
It was echoed by Blair, FBI Director Robert Mueller, acting U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of Intelligence and Research John Dinger, and the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency Lt. Gen. Ronald L. Burgess, Jr.
While no one referenced specific plots against the U.S., all of the officials agreed with Blair that they were "certain" another attempt would be made in the next three to six months.
Panetta pointed to the recent failed attack that occurred on a Christmas Day flight headed to Detroit. Intelligence officers were warned about the suspected terrorist but due to a failure to "connect the dots" in a timely fashion and a profile that raised no inherent red-flags, he was able to fly under the radar.
"Obviously, they decided to make use of someone like that within a very short period of time," Panetta said.
In other words, they are no more "certain" of an attack taking place than the Bush administration was about 9/11.
The difference will be that if there is a terrorist attack, these bureaucrats will be able to say "I told ya so."
This is the state of the "War on Terror" - or whatever the Obama administration is calling it - today in America. There may not be much dot connecting, but they have the bureaucratic CYA game down cold.
![](https://s3.amazonaws.com/ssl-intgr-net/tags/7_74_19.gif)
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Massachusetts vs. the Second Amendment
- Florida Voter Fraud Case Could Overturn U.S. House Race
- Not Your Grandfather’s Foreign Aid
- Christian Morality, Migration, And The Good Samaritan
- Shaken, Not Stirred: The James Bond Complex
- Who is the Real Unelected President?
- Democrats Prepare for the Big House
- Democrat Hypocrisy on Born-Alive Care
- Government Downsizing and the Left’s Instinctive Outcry
- Trump is Closing the Border. Now What About Legal Immigration?
Blog Posts
- Trump and Hegseth are killing it
- Uganda upset at lack of condoms, lubricants — blames USAID funding freeze
- Why would anyone be a Democrat?
- Protecting the Second Amendment is protecting the First
- A tale of two tax plans
- Another case of demand for racism exceeding supply
- Corruption in Chicago’s courts
- Memo suggests the City of San Diego's government is loaded with illegals
- Buttigieg insinuates that Trump’s IG firing spree has something to do with promoting ‘waste, fraud, and abuse’
- Why is Tom Cotton blocking a Trump DOD nominee?
- The German central bank agrees with President Trump!
- Trump must take on China’s vape smugglers
- CBS's Margaret Brennan scolds Marco Rubio on free speech by suggesting it caused the Holocaust
- Four magical words
- Maybe we could ask Al Gore, John Kerry, and the UN to explain why we should go along with the Paris Climate Agreement?