PrintJanuary 21, 2010
'Bipartisan' Obama?
From Der Spiegel:
The Financial Times Deutschland writes:He could now focus his concentration on his political base and push through his policy agenda. After all, he still has a majority in Congress -- he could back away from his strategy of bipartisanship ... which would mean giving up much of what he spent his first year in office creating.
I don't think I would take any financial advice from The Financial Times Deutschland -- they think Obama's agenda has been bipartisan.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Not in Kansas Any More
- Democrats Dying on the Most Desolate Hills
- If She’s an Astronaut … I’m a Jet Fighter Pilot
- Is the Jihadist Trojan Horse Winning?
- Who Has the Best American Autobiography?
- This Easter, Let Us Renew Our Faith
- Is it Time to Ignore the Judiciary?
- Higher Ed is Fighting Back!
- Easter: the Resurrection of Jesus Transformed the World Forever
- Trump’s vision for technological greatness
Blog Posts
- Hillary ‘the Russia Hoaxer’ Clinton wants to imprison people for ‘propaganda’
- Rep. Jamie Raskin threatens foreign leaders who cooperate with President Trump with repercussions, 'when we come back to power — and we will'
- Maybe we need more living versions of “Hillbilly Funerals”
- A female fencer's courage is partly rewarded
- Democrats' Cloward-Piven default
- A New Mexico judge resigned over allegations that he kept a Tren de Aragua member in his home
- The Pope’s death is leading to yet more anti-Israel and anti-Trump propaganda
- Ivy League college invites antisemitic rapper onto campus
- Pope Francis, RIP
- It’s not really about Abrego Garcia
- When Oregon became Bart Jason
- Post-election lawfare; legislating from the bench
- Oregon pushes trans track
- The Starliner: worse than we thought
- Professional sports leagues push gun control