Al Qaeda's internal politics

Recently, I asked, why hadn't we heard from Osama Bin Laden after the Christmas Day bombing attempt?  Did he approve or disapprove? Doesn't the rise of al Qaeda in Yemen inevitably mean rivalry within the jihadist movement?

Bin Laden has now spoken, we think, but intelligence officials have dismissed his recently released taped message, calling it merely an effort by Bin Laden to "appear in direct command."
A former Bin Laden associate says the Yemeni faction want nothing to do with Bin Laden: "I believe that if Osama bin Laden gave these people an instruction, they would do the opposite." Which is unfortunate in his view, because at least his old boss had ethical standards: Bin Laden would consult "religious authorities" before ordering someone's death while these new guys just "attack immediately without any consultation."

And one of Bin Laden's sons recently told Reuters that "If there were no more enemies left on earth, I believe [al Qaeda and the Taliban] would fight each other."

May the jealousy, enmity and distrust continue to thrive between these fanatics.
If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

Most Read


Last 24 Hours

Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
Face the Nonsense, Again: Margaret Brennan’s ‘You Should Watch the News’ Moment
The Activist Judges Who Think They Outrank the President
There Are EVs And There Are Teslas. They Are Not The Same.

Last 7 Days

Righteous Attacks Bringing the Left to Heel
Is Dem Defector Lindy Li A Deep State Double Agent?
Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
Think USAID was bad? You ain't seen nothin' yet.
The Supreme Court Has Long Held That The Alien Enemies Act Gives The President Plenary Power