Political lexicon 101
I just caught this statement in an editorial in the St. Louis Post Dispatch on the latest health care reform proposals.
“How can covering more people actually wind up reducing the deficit?
The answer is that health care reform lays the groundwork for transformational changes to the way Medicare — and, ultimately, all insurance companies — pay doctors and hospitals.”
Would you like to hear what people were saying when George Bush proposed Medicare cuts?
From the New York Times:
The proposals “would undermine our ability to train young doctors at a time when the nation is facing a shortage of doctors,” [Kenneth E. Raske, president of the Greater New York Hospital Association] said.

“Under the proposal,” [William A. Dombi, vice president of the National Association for Home Care and Hospice]Mr. Dombi said, “75 percent to 80 percent of home health agencies would be doomed. They would not be able to meet payroll. They would not be able to operate.”
From The Washington Post:
"This administration ought to know that five years' worth of Medicare and Medicaid cuts totaling $200 billion are dead on arrival with me and with most of the Congress," Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., and chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, told the Associated Press.
"President Bush's proposed cuts to Medicare would hurt older and disabled Americans and take a wrecking ball to many essential hospitals across the country," Robert M. Hayes, president of the Medicare Rights Center, said in a prepared statement. "It is indefensible for the President to propose hurting America's grandparents while maintaining his rabid defense of Medicare overpayments to for-profit health insurance companies."
Note that the cuts George Bush proposed in 2008 were $200 billion. In 2009, Sen. Max Dead-On-Arrival Baucus proposed cuts in Medicare/Medicaid/SCHIP of $404 billion.
So we can add something new to our political lexicon:
- If a Republican proposes Medicare cuts, it is “a wrecking ball” that will “hurt older and disabled Americans” and doom “75 percent to 80 percent of home health agencies.”
- If a Democrat proposes even bigger Medicare cuts, it is “health care reform” that “lays the groundwork for transformational changes.”
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
- Malicious Imbeciles
- Face the Nonsense, Again: Margaret Brennan’s ‘You Should Watch the News’ Moment
- Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
- The Activist Judges Who Think They Outrank the President
- Dismantling USAID Services in Africa
- There Are EVs And There Are Teslas. They Are Not The Same.
Blog Posts
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction
- Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
- Payback: J.D. Vance calmly gives Denmark a real reason to be paranoid since they're asking for it
- Political shenanigans in Texas
- Jasmine Crockett tries to backpedal her ‘hot wheels’ comment about a wheelchair-bound Gov. Abbott, forgets the internet archives exist
- Signal debacle – maybe intentional
- Trump’s executive orders have big leftist law firms running scared
- In Denmark, Americans have become 'the deplorables'
- Mike Huckabee and a turning point in US-Israel relations
- Up is down, down is up!
- Who will thaw the Arctic?
- Do trans people expect us to abandon common sense?
- Impeach the judges
- How Mississippi eliminated the income tax
- The ‘agua’ battle on the border