Baehr essentials
- David Brooks has spent too much time at the New York Times, and at times, he has gone a little soft . The same thing happens to some conservative Supreme Court justices after they are appointed and move to DC. Brooks holds down one of the two spots for conservative writers on the Times op ed page. You don't see Frank Rich, Paul Krugman, Maureen Dowd, Nick Kristof, Charles Blow , Roger Cohen, Gail Collins or Bob Herbert, moving right to make friends with Brooks. But Brooks seems to try to charm his colleagues with his reasonableness. Any more columns on Barack Obama and Reinhold Niebuhr, and I promise never to read him again. Today Brooks takes on health care reform, and manages to conclude that it should be voted down. But just barely.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps
- Reality Check for Democrats
- A MAGA Siege of the Democrats’ Deep State
- Why Incel and 4B Culture Matter
- Defending Donald Trump: A Response to Jeffrey Goldberg and The Atlantic on the Signal Leak
- Are Judges Complicit in Lawfare?
- Deep Dive: The Signal Chat Leak
- Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune
- Where We Need Musk’s Chainsaw the Most
- Trump Is Not Destroying the Constitution, but Restoring It
Blog Posts
- A Ph.D. in ‘Molecular and Cell Biology’ shows the difference between credentials and knowledge
- Nasty Venezuelan migrant who flashed taxpayer dollars and urged squatting, gets thrown out
- Watch white leftist women’s brains breaking—and repairing—in real-time
- The last, best hope ...
- In Pennsylvania, are Democrats stealing votes again?
- Knife control comes to the U.K.: Prime Minister Starmer bans Ninja swords
- This Tuesday, Wisconsonites must vote for Brad Schimel for the State Supreme Court
- Was Vietnam worth the cost?
- Democrats should get a clue from the Palestinians who are now marching against Hamas
- Trump takes on Fauxahontas's brainchild
- Consumer Sentiment Survey: This too shall pass
- If they only had knife control....
- Newsom and Walz struggle to appear normal
- Anti-Trump lawfare: yes, it's a conspiracy
- Criminal attack? You're on your own.