November 5, 2009
Anti-Israel animosity comes from one party only
Last December, after 7000 rockets were fired from Gaza against Israeli civilians, Israel finally took military action to stop the bombardment. Following a 23 day war, the UN Human Rights Commission, composed of such stellar advocates of human rights as Sudan, Cuba, China, and Saudi Arabia, sent a "Fact-Finding Mission" headed by Richard Goldstone into Gaza. They conducted uncritical interviews with officials of Gaza's Hamas government and militia claiming to be civilians. Their version of events was accepted without corroboration.
The commission then issued a 575-page report accusing Israel of applying disproportionate force, targeting civilians, destroying civilian infrastructure and using human shields in its offensive. The report recommends that the U.N. Security Council require Israel to investigate and prosecute those responsible for the alleged crimes. Failing this, they recommend that the U.N. Security Council refer the report to the International Criminal Court, a war crimes tribunal.
Tuesday, the House of Representatives of the US Congress condemned the U.N. report as "irredeemably biased and unworthy of further consideration or legitimacy." House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer called the report "unfair, unbalanced and inaccurate" in its portrayal of Israel's response to attacks from Hamas. On a 344-36 vote, the House passed a resolution urging President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton "to oppose unequivocally any endorsement" of the report. Twenty-two representatives voted "present."
The good news is that 344 Representatives or 80% of the House, supported the measure. While it is gratifying that Congress condemned the report by such a large margin, of note is the fact that those who refused to condemn the report, either by voting against it or voting present, overwhelmingly came from one side of the aisle. Of the 36 who voted against it, 33 were Democrats. Of the 22 who voted "present" 20 were Democrats. This means that 91% of those who refused to support the House resolution were Democrats.
This lesson should not be lost on Jewish voters. Nor will it be lost on all voters who are concerned about the morality of failing to condemn those terrorists who would wage war against civilians.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Biden's National Censorship Regime
- Four Years, Five Fiascos: The Toll of Government Overreach
- The Legacy of the Roberts Court
- Parental Rights at Risk from Tyrannical State Overreach
- Alexander Hamilton: A Brilliant and Conflicted Leader
- The Death of the Center-Left in America
- ‘Make Peace, You Fools! What Else Can You Do?’
- When Nuclear Regulation Goes Awry
- The Danger of Nothing
- A New Pope With Courage
Blog Posts
- Fredi Otto, the new Greta Thunberg
- Why Democrats should become Republicans
- Terrorism works?
- Are we prepared for a new Chinese period of the warring states?
- Trump challenges the Fed
- The last Austrian standing
- Tim Walz: helping China colonize Minnesota?
- Another insubordinate officer?
- Keeping terrorists in America
- Celebrate Earth Day by not burning a Tesla
- Minnesota state bureaucrat charged with vandalizing Teslas to the tune of $20,000 is let off scot-free
- Trump’s plan for Gaza vs. the New York Times
- What’s next for Syria?
- Tulsi Gabbard's latest Biden revelation
- Mexican ammo wranglers