« Andersen Claims'Two Sources' for Ayers' Role in Dreams | Graph of the Day for September 29, 2009 »
September 29, 2009
Incompetence and stupidity by our Sudan envoy
These statements by our Special Envoy to Sudan Scot Gration beggar belief. Can someone really be so ill informed, naive, and just plain ignorant as to say stuff like this?
"We've got to think about giving out cookies," said Gration, who was appointed in March. "Kids, countries, they react to gold stars, smiley faces, handshakes, agreements, talk, engagement."
Michael Goldfarb of the Weekly Standard blog fills in the details on this mountebank:
This from the man who took it upon himself to declare the genocide in Darfur over -- mere "remnants of genocide" remain he told reporters in June -- at a time when even our push-over Ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, was still accusing the Sudanese regime of that precise crime. (Gration would later try and make amends by telling the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that "Susan Rice is one of my dear friends. There are few women in the world that I would say, 'I love you' to, and Susan is one of them. I love Susan Rice.") Only three months before Gration issued his summary judgment that the genocide in Darfur had come to an end, Sudanese President Omar al Bashir was indicted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court. Gration is pushing the administration to normalize relations with this indicted war criminal.
A piece in the New Republic this summer slammed Gration for "fashioning his Sudan policy around an ideological attraction to carrots and an aversion to sticks--when everything we know about Sudan tells us that this is precisely the wrong tactic." Apparently Gration and Obama have moved on from carrots to cookies and gold stars. This explains perfectly the administration's approach to Burma (Clinton is talking of dropping sanctions), Russia (abandoning missile defense), Iran (submitting to talks on the ridiculous terms laid out by the Iranians), and North Korea (dumping the Six Party talks for bilateral negotiations). And if Obama pulls the plug on the war in Afghanistan, it may be cookies for the Taliban, too.
Is this fellow a first class idiot or what?
And yet, this is our new "smart" foreign policy. Maybe we should change that to "smart foreign policy for dummies, run by dummies, and thought up by dummies."
Hat Tip: Ed Lasky
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Don't Trust Me, I'm a Doctor
- China Doesn't Know What to Do With Trump
- The Trump Administration Is Cleaning Up Our Military Academies
- No to Automatic Birthright Citizenship
- President Trump Can Snatch a Deep-Water Port in South America that China Covets
- The FBI Knew All Along
- Sotomayor’s Specter: No, the Alien Enemies Act Can’t Deport Americans
- Democrats Trade Morality for Madness
- Bringing Immigration Policy into Focus
- Judicial Imperialism: The House of Boasberg and the Left’s War on Sovereignty
Blog Posts
- New study: ‘Liberals generally trust science more than conservatives’
- Bondi DOJ allegedly evading FOIA requests for Epstein documents
- Whoopi Goldberg calls for higher taxes to keep the government big and well fed
- Why is Bondi’s DOJ still prosecuting a pistol brace owner?
- ‘Perceived foes’
- The echoes of valor
- Junk science at NOAA about to come to an end
- Donald Trump, free trade champion
- Junk science and air pollution
- Securing the border
- DOGE removes a dead-ender fighting his own Fallujah at the Social Security Administration -- and the left melts down
- Why we’ll almost certainly never see a 1929-style crash again
- Impatiently waiting for the Trump team in Oregon
- The Maximum Support Act: A bipartisan push for Iranian democracy and human rights
- The intifada in Germany claims another victim