August 25, 2009
What's missing in the end of life counseling
Taken out of the classroom/off the bureaucrat's desk, this is just the step down the slippery slope of government defining what is and what isn't a worthwhile life.
It's very different to ask me "end of life" questions when I'm 65 and in reasonably good health as opposed to when I'm 85, in a nursing home, confined to bed and in manageable pain. Let's add a few more questions to the list of choices.
Would I like to see my spouse again?
would I like to see my children again?
Would I like to see my grandchildren again?
Would any of them like to see me again?
How about a beautiful spring or fall day?
What about that crab louie that I brought to my mother a every day that I visited her when she was confined to a nursing home. The look on her face didn't fit with the Do Not Resuscitate order that had to be signed every six months. Her eyes spoke of happiness and love, not what do you think, is today the day?
This entire debate over health care lacks any attention to the human factor in these decisions. These decisions need to be and should be made by individuals or someone that cares about them, not by a set of academic, antiseptic, bureaucratic guide lines that are designed to assist the government in controlling health care costs.
How is it that prisoners of war, like Senator John McCain, tortured and mistreated, managed to survive when to have said you're right, I should give up and die because my life isn't worth living would have been for the greater good. It is because of the human condition. He care about himself and others and others cared about him. None of his fellow prisoners encouraged him to make end of life decisions. Certainly his wife and family didn't encourage him to make decisions that would take him forever from their lives. He survived that pain, confinement and isolation because he didn't want take the alternative.
I fear that our President, while a gifted orator and charismatic leader, is, at his core, a cold calculating manager who is comfortable in making abstract decisions about anyone not in his immediate view.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The NYT Prefers its Own Conspiracy Theories
- Would the FDA Pass Its Own Audit?
- War By Other Means: Demographics
- The Trump Administration’s Support for the Israel-Azerbaijan Strategic Partnership Can Benefit America
- This U.S. Under Trump is Strengthening Critical Minerals Sovereignty
- Upheaval and Pushback
- Why Do Democrats Hate Women and Girls?
- There is No Politics Without an Enemy
- On the Importance of President Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’
- Let a Robot Do It
Blog Posts
- Look at all the benefits of socialism!
- French right-wing leader Le Pen banned from running for office
- The case for Alberta as the 51st US state
- Putting tariffs into perspective
- Iran’s nuclear countdown: Can Trump hold the line?
- Putin in the crosshairs
- I'm looking through you -- where did you go?
- So Milley was running the whole Ukraine war with Russia without telling the public -report
- New York’s ‘clean energy’ demands are unattainable, per industry’s own experts
- Astronauts carefully tell the truth
- California voters introduce new health care ‘access’ ballot initiative named after Luigi Mangione
- ‘American Oversight’? What a joke!
- Pete Hegseth in the line of fire—again
- Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is accused of plagiarizing parts of his Oxford thesis
- France goes the Full Maduro, bans leading opposition frontrunner, Marine Le Pen, from running for the presidency