August 11, 2009
Obama Lies About Supporting Single Payer at NH Town Hall
In response to an ill-framed question - one of only two that were not from Obama supporters - asked of him at the Potemkin Village-style health care "town hall" in Portsmouth, New Hampshire on August 11, President Obama said this:
"I have not said that I was a single-payer supporter, because, frankly, we historically have had a employer-based system in this country, with private insurers, and for us to transition to a system like that, I believe would be too disruptive."
Tracking the misrepresentations and lies that are told when Obama speaks can keep one busy for hours, but the one about not supporting single payer really stood out.
On June 30, 2003, speaking to an AFL-CIO Civil, Women's, and Human Rights Conference, Obama said:
"I happen to be a proponent of single payer universal health care plans. . . A single payer health care plan, a universal health care plan. And that's what I'd like to see. But as all of you know, we may not get there immediately. Because first we have to take back the White House, we have to take back the Senate, and we have to take back the House."
As recently as August 18, 2008, according to the Wall Street Journal article titled "Obama Touts Single-Payer System for Health Care," published on August 19, 2008, "Barack Obama said he would consider embracing a single-payer health-care system, beloved by liberals, as his plan for broader coverage evolves over time."
The WSJ article quotes Obama speaking at "a town-hall style meeting on the economy" the day before:
"If I were designing a system from scratch, I would probably go ahead with a single-payer system."
The WSJ quoted Obama as saying further that, although he didn't think a single payer system was feasible initially:
"They [Americans] need relief now. So my attitude is let's build up the system we got, let's make it more efficient, we may be over time-as we make the system more efficient and everybody's covered-decide that there are other ways [single payer?] for us to provide care more effectively."
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Podcast Appearances Facilitate Winning Political Campaigns: Implementing Success
- Why Europe Should Close the Door to Most Migrants
- Conservative Policies: The Answer to the Housing Crisis?
- Surviving a House Fire
- Liberalism is incompatible with Christianity
- That Strange, Persistent, Cheering at a CEO's Murder is Proof We Are Now an Idiocracy
- North Korea is China's Proxy
- Scientific Societies Err on 'Climate Change'
- A 2025 Year of Jubilee Could End Slavery in America
- The Laken Riley Act Must Become Law
Blog Posts
- Newsom begs Trump to come to California -- not mentioning Kamala, who has a house in the path of the inferno
- Newsom, Bass guilty of negligent homicide
- I got a feelin' called the DEI blues
- Trump lawfare: it's far from over
- Trans college volleyball: the season ends, the lawsuits begin
- The Fed goes ‘proactively hostile’ against Trump
- How would a Japanese leader handle the California fires?
- The flu shot: More questions than answers
- Should we expect J6 pardons?
- Los Angeles burns, and Lex Luthor was right
- Who’s to blame for the LA fires?
- President-elect Trump and naval ship design
- Ambassadors who support terror
- Defund the Police: we are the enemy
- Second Amendment outlook for 2025