May 6, 2009
Subtraction By Addition, Obama Style
With Obama's magic beans, government is about to become leaner -- by hiring 20,000 new government employees.
Reuters reports that "President Barack Obama's Defense Department plans to create 20,000 new jobs."
Will those 20,000 new people build infrastructure in Afghanistan or Iraq? No.
Will they offload some of the logistics, training or personnel tasks of our armed forces? No.
What will they do? "Manage a revamp of the way the United States buys billions of dollars of weapons each year."
By my arithmetic, 20,000 employees cost, in round numbers, $2 billion or more per year. (If they hire only 19,000 instead, Obama's savings target of $100 million could be achieved in the first year alone.)
I worked at McDonnell Douglas in the 1980's, when it had about 30,000 employees in St. Louis. Here's what 30,000 or so people could do.
- Produce the F/A-18 Hornet for the US Navy.
- Produce the F-15 Eagle for the US Air Force.
- Produce the AV-8 Harrier for the US Marines.
- Produce the Harpoon and Tomahawk missiles.
- Research and develop the next USAF fighter.
- Research and develop the next USN fighter.
- Research, develop and produce a host of related technology products, from laser communications to CAD/CAM software packages.
And I'm sure I forgot some things. These people didn't just "manage" those programs; they designed, built, tested, delivered and supported those things. Those things had to work. And when they were needed, they did.
Now this might be news to some of you, but the Pentagon already has employees who manage defense acquisition. In 2003, the DoD had 636,000 civilian employees. Obama wants to add 20,000 to that.
So what will they do exactly? If the answer is "manage" the way the US buys weapons, we already had people to do that, probably a good chunk of that 636,000. So what will these new 20,000 people do?
And here's a tip. If you think changing some contracts from cost-plus to fixed-cost, or from multi-year to annual, that's already been thought of and tried. Every type of contract and incentive you can think of has been tried. Some are better in some cases, some better in others. Many good minds have been thinking and doing a lot about this issue for years. There are no magic bullets to saving lots of money in defense acquisition with no loss of quality or quantity.
Adding 20,000 new managers for this age-old issue will have one primary effect: increasing the demand for larger meeting rooms.
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Trump’s Chess Game Is Improving
- Trump Has the Taxpayers’ Back
- Downsizing the Federal Government
- Is There A Problem With Colorado State University And Its Nipah Virus Research?
- Media Titans Rattled by Lawsuits
- Tribalism: The Key to Understanding Islam
- Reaching for the Source of Meaning and Certitude
- The Musk-eteers Reveal You’ve Been Living in a Simulated Reality
- America Must, Can, And Should Renew Its Nuclear Energy Dominance
- Trump and the States Confront Digital Issues
Blog Posts
- Democrats decry Trump’s cancellation of ‘green’ subsidies because he’s ending a ‘low-cost’ industry
- Larry Summers and four other Democrat Treasury secretaries come out together to howl about DOGE
- Anti-white propagandists spread disinformation to spur race wars in South Africa
- Democrats are politically bipolar on illegal immigration
- Country as home
- Legos called ‘heteronormative,’ problematic
- President Trump addresses his largest TV audience ever during an interview before the Super Bowl yesterday
- Lawfare 2.0: A New York judge launches a coup
- Politically bipolar
- My experience with USAID and Israel
- Marco Rubio, not Obama, on Cuba
- Homeland Security Secretary Noem accuses FBI of leaking news of ICE raids to the press
- Rathergate at 21
- Revisiting Benghazi
- The Second Amendment: new Trumpian opportunities