February 26, 2009
The Obama Way: Hit the Ground Promising
One of President Obama's first actions on his first full day in office was to announce a pay freeze for White House staff . He did that by a Presidential Memorandum, his first ever, on January 21 . However, that memorandum did not establish any particular levels; it merely directed his Chief of Staff to report back in 30 days.
"I intend to freeze the salaries of senior members of the White House staff, to the extent permitted by law. I direct you to report back to me within 30 days with recommendations for actions to implement this freeze.")
According to Josh Gerstein at Politico, those 30 days came and went and, indeed, Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel dutifully reported - orally.
"Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel delivered the report orally in time to comply with a 30-day deadline Obama set on his first full day in office, according to the [un-named] spokesman. However, Obama's early announcement left some questions unresolved... A spokesman said he had no further details on what specifics Emanuel recommended."
So we have it on the authority of an unnamed spokesman that, really, Rahm Emanuel said something to Barack Obama about that pay freeze, just like he was supposed to. But we have no details on those "recommendations for actions to implement" the freeze.
We have an intention on January 21 and an oral report on February 21. If there is a freeze, none of us knows what the levels are. For all we know, they are "frozen" at the maximum amount allowed under law, meaning no real freeze at all. This falls into the category of things we know we don't know.
The original intent to freeze salaries was announced to the press, dutifully reported by the press, put in writing and made available on the White House's web site. The actual "report" was an oral one, given in private, with no known details, and we know this only from an unnamed spokesman. And still no pay freeze.
This is worth noting only in respect to the insight it gives us into how business is conducted in the Obama White House. Announce something good-sounding, follow it up with nothing real, and no one's the wiser.
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Trump’s Chess Game Is Improving
- Trump Has the Taxpayers’ Back
- Downsizing the Federal Government
- Is There A Problem With Colorado State University And Its Nipah Virus Research?
- Media Titans Rattled by Lawsuits
- Tribalism: The Key to Understanding Islam
- Reaching for the Source of Meaning and Certitude
- The Musk-eteers Reveal You’ve Been Living in a Simulated Reality
- America Must, Can, And Should Renew Its Nuclear Energy Dominance
- Trump and the States Confront Digital Issues
Blog Posts
- Democrats decry Trump’s cancellation of ‘green’ subsidies because he’s ending a ‘low-cost’ industry
- Larry Summers and four other Democrat Treasury secretaries come out together to howl about DOGE
- Anti-white propagandists spread disinformation to spur race wars in South Africa
- Democrats are politically bipolar on illegal immigration
- Country as home
- Legos called ‘heteronormative,’ problematic
- President Trump addresses his largest TV audience ever during an interview before the Super Bowl yesterday
- Lawfare 2.0: A New York judge launches a coup
- Politically bipolar
- My experience with USAID and Israel
- Marco Rubio, not Obama, on Cuba
- Homeland Security Secretary Noem accuses FBI of leaking news of ICE raids to the press
- Rathergate at 21
- Revisiting Benghazi
- The Second Amendment: new Trumpian opportunities