January 16, 2009
Who Made the World Safer? Bush or Clinton
If you listen to the liberal version of American History, you will learn that by befriending the world Bill Clinton made it safer, and by acting unilaterally George Bush made the world more dangerous. Of course I have never been one to suggest that we listen to the liberal version of anything.
Allow me to suggest that when it comes right down to it, the difference between the past two US Presidents comes down to two events, almost ten years apart.
The First was September 13, 1993 the signing of the Oslo accords. Under the stewardship of Bill Clinton, Israeli Prime Minister Rabin and Palestinian Terrorist Yassir Arafat signed an agreement for Israel to begin transferring power to the terror master. Nine months later Arafat triumphantly arrived in Gaza, beginning his iron-fisted rule and began to steal all the foreign aid that he could.
From that date, literacy in the Palestinian territories began to slip, infant mortality began to rise and the world was taught a very important lesson-- Terrorism Works. It is a viable way to get what you want. The President of the United States, with the help of the Israeli Prime Minister just proved it.
Six months shy of ten years later, President George directed American forces to attack Iraq, nine months after that, Saddam Hussein was captured.
While no weapons of mass destruction were ever found, we know that Saddam had used them in his long war against Iran and against his own Kurdish subjects.
What ever happened to the other WMDs? No one knows for sure, I happen to subscribe to the theory that the fuel for the Syrian bomb factory laid waste by the Israeli Airforce almost two years ago came from Iraq.
No matter what the fate of the WMDs, this much can proved without a doubt. Saddam Hussein's Iraq was a state sponsor of Terrorism. Internally he terrorised his own people. Externally he paid the surviving families of any homocide bombers that killed Israelis.
Despite the mistakes that caused it to last longer than it should have, our incursion into Iraq was a battle against terrorism. Beyond Saddam, we fought al Qaeda and Iran on Iraqi turf. Through our mission in Iraq we have started to teach the world that maybe terrorism is not a viable form of political expression.
The War that George Bush fought was the child of the agreement that Bill Clinton made ten years earlier.
Two Presidents, one empowered a terrorist monster and left the world a less safe, the other destroyed one and made us more secure.
Thank you President Bush.
Allow me to suggest that when it comes right down to it, the difference between the past two US Presidents comes down to two events, almost ten years apart.
The First was September 13, 1993 the signing of the Oslo accords. Under the stewardship of Bill Clinton, Israeli Prime Minister Rabin and Palestinian Terrorist Yassir Arafat signed an agreement for Israel to begin transferring power to the terror master. Nine months later Arafat triumphantly arrived in Gaza, beginning his iron-fisted rule and began to steal all the foreign aid that he could.
From that date, literacy in the Palestinian territories began to slip, infant mortality began to rise and the world was taught a very important lesson-- Terrorism Works. It is a viable way to get what you want. The President of the United States, with the help of the Israeli Prime Minister just proved it.
Six months shy of ten years later, President George directed American forces to attack Iraq, nine months after that, Saddam Hussein was captured.
While no weapons of mass destruction were ever found, we know that Saddam had used them in his long war against Iran and against his own Kurdish subjects.
What ever happened to the other WMDs? No one knows for sure, I happen to subscribe to the theory that the fuel for the Syrian bomb factory laid waste by the Israeli Airforce almost two years ago came from Iraq.
No matter what the fate of the WMDs, this much can proved without a doubt. Saddam Hussein's Iraq was a state sponsor of Terrorism. Internally he terrorised his own people. Externally he paid the surviving families of any homocide bombers that killed Israelis.
Despite the mistakes that caused it to last longer than it should have, our incursion into Iraq was a battle against terrorism. Beyond Saddam, we fought al Qaeda and Iran on Iraqi turf. Through our mission in Iraq we have started to teach the world that maybe terrorism is not a viable form of political expression.
The War that George Bush fought was the child of the agreement that Bill Clinton made ten years earlier.
Two Presidents, one empowered a terrorist monster and left the world a less safe, the other destroyed one and made us more secure.
Thank you President Bush.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree
- Jasmine Crockett, Queen of Ghettospeak
- The Racial Content of Advertising
- Why Liberal Judges Have a Lot to Answer For
- Dismissing Evil and Denying the Holocaust — What’s the Endgame?
- The Witkoff Warning: Will Jordan’s King Fall?
- Can Trump Really Abolish the Department of Education?
- Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
- We Can Cure Democracy, But Can We Cure Stupid?
- George Clooney: Master of Cringe
Blog Posts
- Two new revelations about the Signal leak, along with two theories
- Big Tech’s Invisible Hand: How Google and Meta manipulate our elections
- New report: Netherlands is now euthanizing minors
- Tantalizing tidbits: Five news stories about leftists, and sea lions, acting aggressively
- Rockets to Roses: Israel’s bizarre trade cycle with Aza
- Fort Knox? Gold cams!
- There is no birthright citizenship for illegal aliens
- Turn off the phone. Close the laptop.
- Nine reasons Democrats are doomed to irrelevance
- Wagner College should restore Trump’s honorary degree—and set a national example against cancel culture
- The Signal Scandal was a nothingburger, but the WSJ takes the opportunity to attack Vance
- The Trump effect: An unprecedented investment surge and economic renewal
- Hydrocarbon-friendly Trump a match for energy-hungry India
- And Big Bird can’t sing
- The DC appellate court order affrming Judge Boasberg dishonestly ignores its lack of jurisdiction