January 8, 2009
Relax, Burris says he 'don't have no money'
Anyone the least bit concerned of possible impropriety in Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich's selection to fill the very vacant Senate seat he is accused of auctioning to the highest bidder can breathe a big sigh of relief. Yesterday, former Illinois Attorney General Roland W. Burris, the man so selected, assured reporters that "there was certainly no pay to play involved because I don't have no money."
Now that's the caliber of eloquence we expect in a Senator, particularly one chosen to replace the uniquely articulate next President of the United States.
And the statement's facts are no more solid than its grammar, unless of course the double negative was a deliberate deception. On top of his six figure Illinois annual pension and his $70,000 combined wages as director of Inland Real Estate Corp, one can only imagine his take as Senior Council for the Milwaukee law firm of Gonzalez Saggio & Harlan. Oh, and let's not forget his stake in lobbying firm Burris & Lebed Consulting, which offers its "inside baseball" media strategy geared toward "affecting opinion" in the arena of "both the general public and government leaders."
No money? Perhaps not enough to sit at the same table as Blago's other Chicago and Springfield players, but likely to benefit from Obama's promised tax cuts he is not. The simple-man persona conveyed on camera notwithstanding, he remains, after all, just another player in the slime which is Chicago politics.
Nonetheless, let's all cheer loudly for Burris. And for Caroline Kennedy. If the Democrats want to award color and pedigree over experience and merit, I say let ‘em. Affirmative Action doesn't fly in general elections, and these will be 2 seats even the Republicans would have a hard time losing in 2010.
Add the likely unamused Minnesota electorate two years later, having suffered four years of clown Al Franken's likely three-ring performance on Capitol Hill, and suddenly, rumors of Republican political demise would appear to have been greatly exaggerated.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The NYT Prefers its Own Conspiracy Theories
- Would the FDA Pass Its Own Audit?
- War By Other Means: Demographics
- The Trump Administration’s Support for the Israel-Azerbaijan Strategic Partnership Can Benefit America
- This U.S. Under Trump is Strengthening Critical Minerals Sovereignty
- Upheaval and Pushback
- Why Do Democrats Hate Women and Girls?
- There is No Politics Without an Enemy
- On the Importance of President Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’
- Let a Robot Do It
Blog Posts
- Look at all the benefits of socialism!
- French right-wing leader Le Pen banned from running for office
- The case for Alberta as the 51st US state
- Putting tariffs into perspective
- Iran’s nuclear countdown: Can Trump hold the line?
- Putin in the crosshairs
- I'm looking through you -- where did you go?
- So Milley was running the whole Ukraine war with Russia without telling the public -report
- New York’s ‘clean energy’ demands are unattainable, per industry’s own experts
- Astronauts carefully tell the truth
- California voters introduce new health care ‘access’ ballot initiative named after Luigi Mangione
- ‘American Oversight’? What a joke!
- Pete Hegseth in the line of fire—again
- Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is accused of plagiarizing parts of his Oxford thesis
- France goes the Full Maduro, bans leading opposition frontrunner, Marine Le Pen, from running for the presidency