December 14, 2008
SEIU caught in fake charity scam
This kind of thing happens more than you might think; unions seeking to give cronies jobs set up fake charities who siphon hundreds of thousands of dollars from membership dues. Sometimes, a small deduction is taken from every union paycheck by the contractor and paid into one of these charities.
In fairness, most of these undertakings are on the up and up. But a California SEIU boondoggle has been unmasked: Not one dime paid into the organization went to the charity's intended beneficiaries for 2 of the 4 years studied:
A nonprofit organization founded by California's largest union local reported spending nothing on its charitable purpose -- to develop housing for low-income workers -- during at least two of the four years it has been operating, federal records show.
The charity, launched by a scandal-ridden Los Angeles chapter of the Service Employees International Union, had total expenses of about $165,000 for 2005 and 2006, and all of the money went to consulting fees, insurance costs and other overhead, according to its Internal Revenue Service filings.
Charity watchdogs say that nonprofits should never have zero program expenses in two successive years and that well-performing charities direct at least 70% of their annual spending to their charitable purpose.
"Of the 5,000-plus charities we've looked at, I don't think we've ever seen one that didn't spend anything on its charitable programs," said Sandra Miniutti, vice president of Charity Navigator, an online rating service.
You can guess where some of those "consulting fees" go although the SEIU charity never mentions it in their tax filings like they're supposed to. Given the fact that they didn't specify where the bulk of their donations came from either, the thought that this is some kind slush fund for union big shots crosses the mind.
It should be interesting to see where this bottoms out. Was some of that money shunted to politicians in unreported cash? That's usually one of the purposes of a slush fund. Another is to wash mob money. The fact that the charity's reported income did not identify the source raises those kinds of questions as well.
Then again, it may simply be a fund that union leaders can dip into whenever they want a little extra cash for that trip to Vegas or the Bahamas. The point is, nothing should surprise us about how these monies were used.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- The Left Achieves Peak Political Insanity
- Saving the Jewish People
- A Third Possible Trump Term?
- Taming the Ravenous Dragon
- Rethinking Reparations For The Living Who Deserve Them
- Smart Cities: Are They Worth It?
- Corey Booker: The Attention Seeker
- Rust Belt Revival
- Birth Rates and the Future of Civilization
- Forebears of Trump’s Reciprocal Tariffs
Blog Posts
- Why Passover matters in 2025
- Lingering question: Did Ukaine have some role in an attempt to kill Trump?
- For now, California has decided not to make oil companies liable for natural disasters
- Tim Pool crowns himself the king of stupid with his backward take on Karmelo Anthony
- Florida teacher sacked after she breaks the law and uses a student’s ‘preferred name’ without parental consent
- Decoding President Trump’s praise for Democrat Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer
- Trump targets sanctuary cities: Who will be the first fool?
- If not revealed, then it never happened
- What will tariffs cost the average American family?
- Can our society regain cohesion and dignity before it's too late?
- No, a 50-percent tariff doesn’t mean a 50-percent price hike
- For Trump and Netanyahu, Iran is the issue
- Mike Huckabee: A game-changer for Israel
- Can schools force-jab children with COVID-19 shots?
- Our Lady of Perpetual Denial