Obama's instructions vs. campaign's actions

In Virginia yesterday, Obama says religious beliefs shouldn't be examined. I can understand why. If he told the truth abouth Black Liberation Theology and its impact on him, he would need to discuss its racial anger and it Marxist social/economic beliefs.

Despite his call for hands off his religious beliefs, his campaign or its willing media suurogates attack Palin for attending a one-time speech by the founder for Jews for Jesus.

Using the left"s "moral equivalency" argument, that's a ratio of 1 week to 20 years, or 1:1,024, and there is no proof whatsoever that Palin agreed with the speaker. Can Obama make the same claim, truthfully?

He hasn't said, one way or the other. Sounds like another present vote to me.

John Lorenz
Church Hill, Tennessee
If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

Most Read


Last 24 Hours

Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
Carney’s Snap Election -- And Trump Saw It Coming
Face the Nonsense, Again: Margaret Brennan’s ‘You Should Watch the News’ Moment
Payback: J.D. Vance calmly gives Denmark a real reason to be paranoid since they're asking for it
Transgender Armageddon: The Zizian Murder Spree

Last 7 Days

Righteous Attacks Bringing the Left to Heel
Is Dem Defector Lindy Li A Deep State Double Agent?
Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
Think USAID was bad? You ain't seen nothin' yet.
Reza Pahlavi at CPAC? Big mistake