July 16, 2008
Global Warming: The Courage To Do Nothing (updated)
Is the scientific debate over on global warming? Not according to the American Physical Society* in this year's July's issue of Physics and Society .
"With this issue of Physics & Society, we kick off a debate concerning one of the main conclusions of the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the UN body which, together with Al Gore, recently won the Nobel Prize for its work concerning climate change research. There is a considerable presence within the scientific community of people who do not agree with the IPCC conclusion that anthropogenic CO2 emissions are very probably likely to be primarily responsible for the global warming that has occurred since the Industrial Revolution. Since the correctness or fallacy of that conclusion has immense implications for public policy and for the future of the biosphere, we thought it appropriate to present a debate within the pages of P&S concerning that conclusion. This editor invited several people to contribute articles that were either pro or con. Christopher Monckton responded ..." [Emphasis added.]
And what did Lord Monckton say?
"Some reasons why the IPCC's estimates may be excessive and unsafe are explained. More importantly, the conclusion is that, perhaps, there is no "climate crisis", and that currently-fashionable efforts by governments to reduce anthropogenic CO2 emissions are pointless, may be ill-conceived, and could even be harmful."
He examined specific assumptions of the IPCC cited computer models and found that, even using the same models but with more justifiable assumptions, carbon dioxide is not a critical threat to global temperatures.
"Theoretically, empirically, and in the literature that we have extensively cited, each of the values we have chosen as our central estimate is arguably more justifiable - and is certainly no less justifiable - than the substantially higher value selected by the IPCC. Accordingly, it is very likely that in response to a doubling of pre-industrial carbon dioxide concentration TS will rise not by the 3.26 °K suggested by the IPCC, but by <1 °K."
He concluded with
"If the concluding equation in this analysis is correct, the IPCC's estimates of climate sensitivity must have been very much exaggerated. There may, therefore, be a good reason why, contrary to the projections of the models on which the IPCC relies, temperatures have not risen for a decade and have been falling since the phase-transition in global temperature trends that occurred in late 2001. Perhaps real-world climate sensitivity is very much below the IPCC's estimates. Perhaps, therefore, there is no "climate crisis" at all. At present, then, in policy terms there is no case for doing anything. The correct policy approach to a non-problem is to have the courage to do nothing." [Emphasis added.]
*According to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Physical_Society, the American Physical Society was founded in 1899 and is the second largest association of physicists in the world, with over 40,000 members. Update:
According to http://www.aps.org/
APS Climate Change StatementAPS Position Remains UnchangedThe American Physical Society reaffirms the following position on climate change, adopted by its governing body, the APS Council, on November 18, 2007:"Emissions of greenhouse gases from human activities are changing the atmosphere in ways that affect the Earth's climate."An article at odds with this statement recently appeared in an online newsletter of the APS Forum on Physics and Society, one of 39 units of APS. The header of this newsletter carries the statement that "Opinions expressed are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the APS or of the Forum." This newsletter is not a journal of the APS and it is not peer reviewed.
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Trump’s Chess Game Is Improving
- Trump Has the Taxpayers’ Back
- Downsizing the Federal Government
- Is There A Problem With Colorado State University And Its Nipah Virus Research?
- Media Titans Rattled by Lawsuits
- Tribalism: The Key to Understanding Islam
- Reaching for the Source of Meaning and Certitude
- The Musk-eteers Reveal You’ve Been Living in a Simulated Reality
- America Must, Can, And Should Renew Its Nuclear Energy Dominance
- Trump and the States Confront Digital Issues
Blog Posts
- Democrats decry Trump’s cancellation of ‘green’ subsidies because he’s ending a ‘low-cost’ industry
- Larry Summers and four other Democrat Treasury secretaries come out together to howl about DOGE
- Anti-white propagandists spread disinformation to spur race wars in South Africa
- Democrats are politically bipolar on illegal immigration
- Country as home
- Legos called ‘heteronormative,’ problematic
- President Trump addresses his largest TV audience ever during an interview before the Super Bowl yesterday
- Lawfare 2.0: A New York judge launches a coup
- Politically bipolar
- My experience with USAID and Israel
- Marco Rubio, not Obama, on Cuba
- Homeland Security Secretary Noem accuses FBI of leaking news of ICE raids to the press
- Rathergate at 21
- Revisiting Benghazi
- The Second Amendment: new Trumpian opportunities