More 'Malarkey' from Congressman Markey
American Thinker has commented before on Edward Markey's affection for America's enemies (for example, Venezuelan tyrant-in-the making Hugo Chavez ).
Now we have this principle on display again (with an added dash of hypocrisy) when it comes to supplying nuclear technology to nations in the Middle East. Today's Boston Globe has an article about the growing interest among some "experts' and Congressmen in having the international community supply a nuclear processing plant to Iran as a way to discourage its own nuclear program-which is quite extensive and certainly on the verge of being beyond the point of return given the billions invested and the sanctions that Iran has had to live through on behalf of the program.
Congressman Markey supports these efforts to provide a nuclear plant for the number one terror-sponsoring nation in the world. This would pose perils. At any time, Iran could kick out the international personnel monitoring the plant. Meanwhile, Iranians would be that much closer to learning the technology behind mastering of the nuclear fuel cycle. Once Iran gets a plant, what would stop Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Libya and other nations from demanding one?
But Markey goes beyond this step and displays an anomalous position when the same prospect is floated regarding Saudi Arabia. In this case, Markey opposes efforts to give nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia. His commentary in today's Wall Street Journal.
Last month, while the American people were becoming the personal ATMs of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was in Saudi Arabia signing away an even more valuable gift: nuclear technology. In a ceremony little-noticed in this country, Ms. Rice volunteered the U.S. to assist Saudi Arabia in developing nuclear reactors, training nuclear engineers, and constructing nuclear infrastructure. While oil breaks records at $130 per barrel or more, the American consumer is footing the bill for Saudi Arabia's nuclear ambitions.
Conversely, America can impose controls on nuclear technology given to Saudi Arabia-an imperfect ally of America but nevertheless more of an ally than Iran.
Perhaps if Markey and many of his fellow Democrats (and some Republcians) would seek to increase American supplies of energy (offshore drilling, ANWAR, nuclear energy) we would relieve the chokeold that oil tyrants hold over America-and the world.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Greenland: How Trump Can Deal with the Raging Danes to America's Advantage
- Greenland at the Crossroads: Why U.S. Leadership is Crucial
- How the Death Penalty Should Work
- Mr. Schumer — You Make No Sense!
- The Price of Reciprocity: Why President Trump’s Tariffs Make Strategic Sense
- The Least Dangerous Branch No More
- Is Bipartisan Nationalism Possible?
- Sitting Down for the 'College Talk'
- Trump’s Tariffs Will Not Cause Inflation
- The Republican Off-Cycle Election Challenge
Blog Posts
- Tim Walz calls Elon Musk 'a loser'
- Adobe meltdown
- Smart nations lining up for tariff deals with President Trump -- and you can just tell which ones they are
- What a month of April 1968
- Tesla vandals and keeping the republic
- The Nashville Police report--sort of
- Florida’s opportunity to defang the property tax monster
- Iran: Israel and the USA have the same objective
- Fighting for babies while black
- America is raising feral children
- Unmanifest Destiny: Is America heading for the ash heap of history?
- A look at the vigilance we need for a safe society
- Mexico supports a terror state
- The making of an anarchist
- Tariffs: Trump, Nancy, and the chatbots (mostly) agree