More from Obama on Why he opted out of Federal financing
Does anyone really believe Obama about why he isn't taking federal money?
And allow me to knock down the straw man argument thrown up by Obama supporters that conservatives shouldn't complain because we don't support federal financing of campaigns.
You are correct. We conservatives abhor government involvement in campaigns. What we abhor more and what Obama supporters don't seem to mind is the lying weasel of a politician Obama is proving himself to be by not telling the truth about why he is not taking federal money for his campaign.
The reason is simple, straightforward and so ridiculously transparent that only an Obama supporter so enamored of their candidate's messiah-like goodness can fail to see it; he can raise 3 times as much money as McCain and the Republicans by eschewing federal financing.
Then why in God's name doesn't he say so?
"Our opponents are dedicated to manipulating this broken system to raise as much money as possible -- and they've proven they are very good at it," Obama's site declares. No mention that Obama's been pretty good at it himself, raising $295 million to John McCain's $122 million. "To compete" -- as if he wouldn't be competitive otherwise -- "Barack has decided to keep putting his faith in ordinary people like you giving only what you can afford."Ordinary people, that is, if your definition of ordinary people includes bundlers who can collect six- and even seven-figure sums for your campaign. Because even as he was rhapsodizing in public about "the grass-roots values that have already changed our politics and brought us this far," Obama was privately cozying up to Hillary Clinton's major fundraisers.Earlier this month, he dispatched his campaign manager, David Plouffe, to woo Clinton bundlers in Washington and New York. This week, Clinton will introduce Obama to nearly 200 of her major bundlers, including some who have raised $1 million or more, in a meeting at the Mayflower Hotel."This group could represent 50 million, if not 100 million, bucks," said one top Clinton strategist.
As I said -- a lying weasel. But you and I both know that revealing their candidate to be a liar is a wasted exercise. It would be one thing if idiot college kids and half wit stoners swallowed this baloney. But real adults have drunk the kool aid too. And it makes you wonder just what this guy has to say or do to wake them up.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Greenland: How Trump Can Deal with the Raging Danes to America's Advantage
- Greenland at the Crossroads: Why U.S. Leadership is Crucial
- How the Death Penalty Should Work
- Mr. Schumer — You Make No Sense!
- The Price of Reciprocity: Why President Trump’s Tariffs Make Strategic Sense
- The Least Dangerous Branch No More
- Is Bipartisan Nationalism Possible?
- Sitting Down for the 'College Talk'
- Trump’s Tariffs Will Not Cause Inflation
- The Republican Off-Cycle Election Challenge
Blog Posts
- Tim Walz calls Elon Musk 'a loser'
- Adobe meltdown
- Smart nations lining up for tariff deals with President Trump -- and you can just tell which ones they are
- What a month of April 1968
- Tesla vandals and keeping the republic
- The Nashville Police report--sort of
- Florida’s opportunity to defang the property tax monster
- Iran: Israel and the USA have the same objective
- Fighting for babies while black
- America is raising feral children
- Unmanifest Destiny: Is America heading for the ash heap of history?
- A look at the vigilance we need for a safe society
- Mexico supports a terror state
- The making of an anarchist
- Tariffs: Trump, Nancy, and the chatbots (mostly) agree