« US, British Diplomats Attacked in Zimbabwe | Bishop Compares Global Warming Deniers with Child Molester »
June 5, 2008
KSM Seeks the Death Penalty
The mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed said that he would welcome becoming a "martyr" if found guilty in his military trial:
Wearing thick glasses and occasionally fussing with his turban or stroking his bushy gray beard, Mohammed seemed noticeably thinner in his first appearance since his capture in Pakistan in 2003. It was a stark contrast to the image the U.S. showed to the world back then, of a slovenly man with disheveled hair, an unshaven face and a T-shirt.Mohammed also sang verses from the Quran, rejected his attorneys and told Judge Ralph Kohlmann, a Marine colonel, that he wants to represent himself at the war crimes trial. The judge warned that he faces execution if convicted of organizing the attacks on America. But the former No. 3 leader of al-Qaida was insistent."Yes, this is what I wish, to be a martyr for a long time," Mohammed declared. "I will, God willing, have this, by you."Mohammed and his four alleged co-conspirators each face death if convicted of war crimes including murder, conspiracy, attacking civilians and terrorism by hijacking planes to attack U.S. landmarks. The murder charges involve the deaths of 2,973 people at the World Trade Center, Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania where passengers forced down their plane.
I personally think they should televise the trial and let the world see that this thug is getting a much fairer shake than he gave his victims not to mention a perfectly legitimate trial that is much fairer than he would receive in most of the countries he has called home.
But that won't happen. In fact, the trial itself may be suspended because the Supreme Court will almost certainly be forced to rule on their legality before all is said and done.
Defense attorneys have called the trial procedures "fundamentally flawed" which may or may not be the case. There is probably enough of a gray area in the law to allow the tribunals but it will depend on the Supreme Court whether or not that is recognized.
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Katy Perry, Astronautesse and Unifying Force
- Small Business and Cybersecurity
- No One Is Above the Law—Including Letitia James
- Ready for Your Home to Become a Government School?
- Iran and the Failure of Collective Security
- Pam Bondi and the Genesis of Black Lives Matter
- Bill Maher Dines with Trump
- A ‘Hands Off’ Revealed Lots Of Anger But Not Much Coherent Thought
- Trump’s National Security Emergency Investigation Into Election Fraud Is Ongoing
- The Left’s Class Action Coup Against Immigration Law
Blog Posts
- Karmelo Anthony is OJ Simpson all over again
- We should beware of terrorists in suits and ties
- Karmelo Anthony’s family starts selling merch, and his fixer pushes ‘celebrity’ status with a bizarre social media video
- Harvard tells Trump to give it money or it’ll shoot the monkey
- Democrats infatuated with criminals and gang members — American citizens? Not so much
- Media scream: ‘Trump is coming for your coffee!’
- Exactly how hard do we want our legislatures to work?
- Rubio brings free speech back to foreign (and domestic) policy
- The erasure of Easter
- Red states rising
- Senator Van Hollen should get some tips from Bukele about keeping Baltimore safe
- Troll: Trump releases docs on foreign gang member a primping senator is trying to bring back from foreign prison
- Not on my bingo card: Conservatives, or at least non-leftists, are coming close to winning elections in California
- Europe, Canada crossing a communist Rubicon from which they cannot return?
- What the Democrat party’s heroes say about them