Jimmy Carter defines terrorism

David Bernstein of the Volokh Conspiracy caught the implications buried in Jimmy Carter's interview on Charlie Rose.

"I think any time any powerhouse takes military action when it's a high danger or almost an inevitability that women and children are going to be killed, I think that can be considered an act of terrorism, yes."

As Bernstein points out, such a definition makes any militarily-sophisticated power a terrorist if it fights just about any war. The United States was a terrorist in WW II, Korea, Vietnam and elsewhere. Too band that Carter didn't make that proposition part of his first campaign for president. That way, we probably would have been spared the Mullahs' revolution in Iran, the rise of Islamic terror, and becoming familiar with the term "stagflation."

Carter is making a strong case to win the title of worst president and worst ex-president.

Hat tip: Ed Lasky

If you experience technical problems, please write to helpdesk@americanthinker.com

Most Read


Last 24 Hours

Reza Pahlavi at CPAC? Big mistake
So Milley was running the whole Ukraine war with Russia without telling the public -report
Canada Embraces European Suicide
I’ve recognized manipulation in the past, and I see it now on the Supreme Court
Astronauts carefully tell the truth

Last 7 Days

Reza Pahlavi at CPAC? Big mistake
Nearing the Final Battle Against the Deep State
Public School Teachers: The Stupidest Creatures on the Planet
Hegseth boards plane flanked by two ‘bada**’ women, and the politically correct capitulation tour continues
Mark Steyn’s Reversal of Fortune