February 18, 2008
Turnout Low for Pakistani Elections
Reflecting both a cynicism that their vote will be jiggered with by President Musharraf and a genuine fear of terrorism, Pakistani voters stayed home in droves today while the vote for a new parliament was conducted:
A number of clashes among polling officials and voters resulted in 10 people killed and 70 injured, according to Pakistani television channels.I suppose when 10 people are killed in clashes with authorities, we can consider that "relatively calm?" One shudders to think what Pakistani government officials would say if the number were 5 times that many.
Voter turnout was low; in the North-West Frontier Province, which abuts the lawless tribal areas, turnout was only 20 percent, according to election officials. In Peshawar, the provincial capital, Islamic militants prevented many women from voting. Election official estimated that only 523 of 6,431 registered female voters at six polling stations cast ballots.
In Lahore, the political capital of Punjab province, lines were thin, and many voters complained they could not find their names on the voting lists. But as the polls closed at 5 p.m. local time, election officials said that nationwide voting had been relatively calm compared with past elections.
This was about as far from a free and fair election you could get and still have the outcome validated by the United States government. Opposition parties were extremely restricted in their movements and in getting their message out since the state run TV network tended only to show Musharraf and his party on the tube. In addition, watch if Musharraf's party gets more than 25% of the vote. That's just about the president's approval rating in Pakistan right now and any more than that probably means a significant amount of vote fraud was undertakne to fix the outcome. Not to rig it so Musharraf's party won the election. But rather to hold down the majorities of both the Pakistani Peoples Party (organization of former PM Bhutto) and the Muslim League which is headed up by another former PM Nawaz Sharif.
If those two parties can combine for more than 2/3 of the seats in Parliament, they would be able to force Musharraf's resignation if they desired. But even without Musharraf trying to fiddle with the vote, it would have been a stretch for those two parties to get that number.
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Trump-O-Phobia Drives Some Americans to Questionable Greener Pastures Overseas
- A Businessman and a Brilliant Strategist
- A Remarkable Headline for a Fascinating Story
- Democrats Unmask Themselves
- How Mexico Became China’s Trojan Horse in U.S. Trade
- Covid Redux: The Bird Flu Scare
- A Taste of the Swamp
- Do We Have 677 Unelected Presidents?
- Global Relations beyond the Prime Directive
- The Democrat Party: The Enemy Within?
Blog Posts
- Hills to Die On: Democrats know how to pick 'em
- Near-death experiences, reliance on oil, and more cataclysmic failures—it’s all just part and parcel of ‘green’ energy
- So where'd America's obesity epidemic come from? Chef Andrew Gruel has a theory ...
- Trump just fired a huge warning shot over Iran’s bow
- Markets respond: Trumpian peace in Russo-Ukrainian war is in the bag
- The time of the hoax
- New York Times goes bipolar on Trump’s border control success
- Mark Kelly decides to offload his Tesla to protest Elon Musk
- The half-million dollar American
- Three things for the U.S. to understand about the Middle East
- Speaker Mike Johnson reveals why the Autopen scandal is a big deal
- The CDC website really needs to update its COVID protocols
- Hands in your back pocket
- Birthright citizenship: The facts
- ‘She’s my little Musk coupe’