February 4, 2008
Thanks for your help, Germany
Germany has refused to deploy additional troops to Afghanistan to assist beleaguered Canadian and Dutch forces in the south.
The flat refusal to help is a big blow to the Bush Administration who are desperately trying to get NATO countries who do not have troops in active combat zones to commit to the fight:
The flat refusal to help is a big blow to the Bush Administration who are desperately trying to get NATO countries who do not have troops in active combat zones to commit to the fight:
A bitter diplomatic row between Germany and the United States deepened yesterday after Berlin flatly rejected demands from Washington that it deploy troops in war-torn southern Afghanistan and angrily dismissed the request as "impertinent" and a "fantastic cheek".Make no mistake. This is the diplomatic crisis of the war in Afghanistan. NATO countries are terrified of the political firestorm that would erupt if they put their troops in harms way and they suffered casualties. The European left is looking for any excuse to get troops out of Afghanistan and if nations like Germany, France, Belgium, and Italy were to change their rules of engagement and allow their troops to engage the Taliban in the south, the political can of worms such actions would open could prove fatal to some governments.
Germany currently has some 3,200 soldiers stationed in comparatively tranquil northern Afghanistan and the capital Kabul as part of the current Nato peacekeeping mission. It has been urged to deploy troops in the south before but has consistently refused.
Yesterday however, it became clear that Washington had stepped up pressure on Berlin to commit troops to the south. The move followed increased Taliban attacks and threats from Canada that it would withdraw its Afghanistan contingent completely unless more Nato troops were sent south.
Canada has lost 77 combat troops in the region. Two US non-governmental studies released this week warned that Afghanistan could once again become a failed state and terrorist haven.
Meanwhile, the Canucks and their 2500 troops along with a small contingent of Dutch soldiers try and hold off the Taliban at the point where inflitration over the Pakistani border is most common - in Kandahar province. This is while German troops sit at the Kabul airport in perfect safety.
If NATO won't fight in Afghanistan where so much is at stake, where will they fight?
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Katy Perry, Astronautesse and Unifying Force
- Small Business and Cybersecurity
- No One Is Above the Law—Including Letitia James
- Ready for Your Home to Become a Government School?
- Iran and the Failure of Collective Security
- Pam Bondi and the Genesis of Black Lives Matter
- Bill Maher Dines with Trump
- A ‘Hands Off’ Revealed Lots Of Anger But Not Much Coherent Thought
- Trump’s National Security Emergency Investigation Into Election Fraud Is Ongoing
- The Left’s Class Action Coup Against Immigration Law
Blog Posts
- Kilmar Abrego Garcia: The hand of Soros in the left's lionization of this illegal?
- In maniacally woke Britain, the Supreme Court recognizes biological sex
- A deplorable explains the animosity for Trump as he cleans up Biden’s messes
- Karmelo Anthony is OJ Simpson all over again
- We should beware of terrorists in suits and ties
- Karmelo Anthony’s family starts selling merch, and his fixer pushes ‘celebrity’ status with a bizarre social media video
- Harvard tells Trump to give it money or it’ll shoot the monkey
- Democrats infatuated with criminals and gang members — American citizens? Not so much
- Media scream: ‘Trump is coming for your coffee!’
- Exactly how hard do we want our legislatures to work?
- Rubio brings free speech back to foreign (and domestic) policy
- The erasure of Easter
- Red states rising
- Senator Van Hollen should get some tips from Bukele about keeping Baltimore safe
- Troll: Trump releases docs on foreign gang member a primping senator is trying to bring back from foreign prison